2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10615-008-0184-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P.L. Wachtel: Relational Theory and the Practice of Psychotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This pull can be diversely conceptualized as the transference, the internalized object relation activated (namely, the self or object representation projected onto the therapist) at a given moment, the defensive operations employed, the interpersonal style, emotion schemas or other (Bernier & Dozier, 2002;Bucci, 2002;Kernberg, 1999). OCT may operate through processes previously described as introjective identification (Tansey & Burke, 1989), projective counteridentification (Grinberg, 2001), selffulfilling prophecy (Wachtel, 2008) and others. What Sandler (1976) described as role-responsiveness can also illuminate the process.…”
Section: Objective Countertransferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This pull can be diversely conceptualized as the transference, the internalized object relation activated (namely, the self or object representation projected onto the therapist) at a given moment, the defensive operations employed, the interpersonal style, emotion schemas or other (Bernier & Dozier, 2002;Bucci, 2002;Kernberg, 1999). OCT may operate through processes previously described as introjective identification (Tansey & Burke, 1989), projective counteridentification (Grinberg, 2001), selffulfilling prophecy (Wachtel, 2008) and others. What Sandler (1976) described as role-responsiveness can also illuminate the process.…”
Section: Objective Countertransferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEX requires some minimal degree of (self-)observing activity combined with experiential or emotional engagement on therapists' part, something that has been described as a 'third position' (Kernberg, 1997), triangular space (Britton, 2004), mentalized affectivity (Jurist, 2005) or the integration of observing and experiencing functions in self-reflexivity (Aron, 2000), to name a few approaches. Thus, although assuming that every experience carries novelty by definition, that assimilative processes always entail a modicum of accommodation (Wachtel, 2008) and even that new patterns can form at the implicit realm of the therapeutic exchange without ever reaching full awareness (D. N. Stern et al, 1998), EEX that is not experienced by therapists as such will not participate in the creation of the potential space that 'is the basis for play, creativity, empathy and other factors that lend richness to human experience and relatedness' (Bram & Gabbard, 2001, p. 686).…”
Section: Emerging Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tradicionalmente, las terapias, sobre todo las basadas en la tradición psicodinámica se han basado en herramientas como la interpretación que han buscado esclarecer el proceso por el cual el paciente ha llegado a ser como es actualmente y cuales son sus dinámicas subyacentes de funcionamiento. Como señala Wachtel (2008) la mayor parte de estas intervenciones ponen el énfasis en el pasado y en el presente, habilitando lo que él llama narrativas explicativas o descriptivas. Para este autor, dicho enfoque necesariamente ha de complementarse, con intervenciones centradas en el futuro, que habiliten narrativas de posibilidad, relatos que permitan al paciente imaginar un futuro diferente y tratar de alcanzarlo.…”
Section: Viendo Al Paciente Mas Allá De Su Realidad Presenteunclassified
“…Cabe consignar que este acento supone una abstracción, ya que el self sólo existe en su relación con el otro, de modo tal que podríamos decir que los ladrillos de la arquitectura mental consisten en díadas self/objeto unidas por un impulso o afecto, tal como postulan Otto Kernberg y muchos otros (Fairbairn, 1952;Kernberg, 1976;Greenberg, Mitchell, 1983;Wachtel, 2008). De todos modos, creo que este enfoque parcial puede ser de utilidad para profundizar en la organización múltiple del self y en las características de la mentalización del mismo.…”
unclassified