1988
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/14/1/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P-parity violation in the dyogen spectrum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relation (15) means that the vacuum of electrically charged particles shields the external electromagnetic field but the contribution from magnetically charged particles antishields it. This agrees with the results of [18] and [19].…”
Section: Effective Lagrangiansupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This relation (15) means that the vacuum of electrically charged particles shields the external electromagnetic field but the contribution from magnetically charged particles antishields it. This agrees with the results of [18] and [19].…”
Section: Effective Lagrangiansupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The curved spaces are also related with condensed matter: they correspond to the systems with effective non-constant masses. Let us mention, that incorporation of the monopole, not only provides the system with degenerate ground state, but also makes possible the dipole transitions preserving orbital quantum number [7]. Hence, incorporating the monopole in the existing quantum dot models, one can provide them by these specific peculiarities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting these expressions in (3.18), we get It is seen, that the ground state of the non-perturbed charge-dyon system has (2|s| + 1)-fold degeneracy (by azimuth quantum number m), while the linear Stark effect completely removes the degeneracy on m. It is proportional to the azimuth quantum number m, while its sign depends on the relative sign of monopole number s and m (the linear Stark effect in the "dyogen atom" possesses similar properties [14]). In contrast to linear Stark effect, the quadratic Stark effect of the ground state is independent neither on sign s, no on sign m.…”
Section: The Stark Effectmentioning
confidence: 90%