1987
DOI: 10.2307/2000686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p-Ranks and Automorphism Groups of Algebraic Curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
1
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
53
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Stichtenoth's proof of Satz 3 in [26]). The second part follows from (1.2) and the same formula, since S. Nakajima has shown in [19], Theorem 2, that for ordinary X, the ramification groups of order ≥ 2 in π vanish. ✷ 2.…”
Section: Automorphisms and Uniformization In Positive Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Stichtenoth's proof of Satz 3 in [26]). The second part follows from (1.2) and the same formula, since S. Nakajima has shown in [19], Theorem 2, that for ordinary X, the ramification groups of order ≥ 2 in π vanish. ✷ 2.…”
Section: Automorphisms and Uniformization In Positive Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…From [Nakajima 1987] we deduce that if G is a p-subgroup of Aut k (C) such that |G| > 2 p g/( p−1), the Hasse-Witt invariant of C is zero. The Deuring-Shafarevich formula (see [Bouw 2000], for instance) then implies that the genus of the quotient curve C/G is zero These results highlight the major role played by G 2 in the study of big actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following non-standard notation introduced by Nakajima in [19] can be useful. Let us denote the covering X → X /S by π.…”
Section: Background and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ordinary curves, Nakajima in his seminal work [19] proved that |Aut(X )| ≤ 84g(X )(g(X ) − 1). 1 However, Nakajima's bound seems to be far from optimal, and a bound of size at most g(X ) 8/5 is expected; see [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%