1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(97)83018-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P XIII.98 DNA adduct detection in the liver of the dragonnet Callionymus lyra and the flounder Platchthys flesus: A potential bioindicator of pollutant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…results also are in accordance with previous works that showed, in suspended matter, concentrations of PCBs within the whole estuary and of PAHs at sites downstream Rouen were higher than the acceptable limit effect defined by the Ospar convention [34]. The potential mutagenicity of PAHs is evidenced further by the work of Boillot et al [35] who reported that flounder (Platichthys flesus) sampled in La Bouille had high amounts of DNA adducts in the liver. The biological responses of D. polymorpha living in the estuary are consistent with the potential (calculated) effects of their body burdens of contaminants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…results also are in accordance with previous works that showed, in suspended matter, concentrations of PCBs within the whole estuary and of PAHs at sites downstream Rouen were higher than the acceptable limit effect defined by the Ospar convention [34]. The potential mutagenicity of PAHs is evidenced further by the work of Boillot et al [35] who reported that flounder (Platichthys flesus) sampled in La Bouille had high amounts of DNA adducts in the liver. The biological responses of D. polymorpha living in the estuary are consistent with the potential (calculated) effects of their body burdens of contaminants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The presence of a DNA adduct in a critical gene provides the potential for occurrence of a mutagenic event, resulting in subsequent alterations in gene expression and a loss of growth control (for a review see Poirier et al 2000). The detection of DNA adducts is widely used as biomarker of aquatic contamination (Burgeot et al 1996;Boillot et al 1997;Ericson et al 1998;Ericson and Larsson 2000;Harvey et al 1997;Kurelec et al 1989a,b;Lyons et al 1999aLyons et al ,b, 2000Stein et al 1994;Stephensen et al 2000;Varanasi et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA adducts are thus probably one of the most relevant indicators of genetic damage due to exposure to toxins. The detection of DNA adducts is widely used as biomarker of aquatic contamination (Dunn et al 1987;Kurelec et al 1989a;Varanasi et al 1989;Ray et al 1991;Stein et al 1994;French et al 1996;El Adlouni et al 1995;Harvey et al 1997;Pfau et al 1997;Burgeot et al 1996;Boillot et al 1997;Ericson et al 1998;Ericson and Lasson 2000;Lyons et al 1999Lyons et al , 2000Stephensen et al 2000). Recently, Rice et al (2000) used English Sole (Pleuronectes vetulus) to test the genotoxic impact of polluted sediment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%