2017
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox036.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P03.18 Detection of human brain cancer in pathological slides using hyperspectral images

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Extraventricular neurocytomas are rare brain tumors with a reported worldwide incidence of only 0.13%. They originate from neuroepithelial tissue and may present throughout the central nervous system. They affect mostly young adults, and have a favorable prognosis. Due to their rarity, they are not well characterized and most features are derived from case reports. Extraventricular neurocytomas tend to be well circumscribed, contrast-enhancing and heterogeneously solid, often partly or mainly cys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourier coefficients [13], normalized difference nuclear index [14], sparse representation [15], box-plot and the watershed method [16], superpixel method [9], markov random fields [17,18], and morphological method [19], were used for hyperspectral image processing and quantification analysis; (3) Machine learning techniques. Many of the advancements have been done in cancer identification using traditional machine learning classification models, such as linear discriminant analysis [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], quadratic discriminant analysis [21], support vector machine [12,17,[20][21][22][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], decision trees [22], k-nearest neighbors algorithm [22,38], k-means [12,19,39], naïve bayes [22], random forests [21,22,34,37], maximum likelihood [40], minimum spanning forest [31], gaussian m...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourier coefficients [13], normalized difference nuclear index [14], sparse representation [15], box-plot and the watershed method [16], superpixel method [9], markov random fields [17,18], and morphological method [19], were used for hyperspectral image processing and quantification analysis; (3) Machine learning techniques. Many of the advancements have been done in cancer identification using traditional machine learning classification models, such as linear discriminant analysis [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], quadratic discriminant analysis [21], support vector machine [12,17,[20][21][22][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], decision trees [22], k-nearest neighbors algorithm [22,38], k-means [12,19,39], naïve bayes [22], random forests [21,22,34,37], maximum likelihood [40], minimum spanning forest [31], gaussian m...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three different classifiers have been employed to automatically distinguish between tumor and normal tissue, using as features only the spectral information of the tissues. A qualitative description of this methodology has been recently published [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%