2014
DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p16 FISH Deletion in Surface Epithelial Mesothelial Proliferations Is Predictive of Underlying Invasive Mesothelioma

Abstract: An atypical mesothelial proliferation along the pleural or peritoneal surface without evidence of invasive tumor poses a diagnostic challenge. Homozygous deletion of p16 (CDKN2A) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been shown to be a good marker of malignancy in mesothelial proliferations, but correlations of p16 status between atypical surface proliferations and underlying mesothelioma have not been described. We used p16 FISH to investigate 11 pleural and 7 peritoneal mesotheliomas that had both… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the problem with all these studies is that there is no proof that the surface proliferation really represents primary in‐situ disease rather than surface spread of invasive disease. Indeed, we have reported previously 18 cases of invasive mesothelioma that had an accompanying surface growth (mainly multilayered rather than single mesothelial cells) and showed that CDKN2A FISH give identical fractions of deleted cells in the invasive and surface components, supporting the idea that such proliferations were probably surface spread of the underlying tumour. Further, none of these reports provides morphological criteria that allow separation of (putative) MIS from reactive mesothelial proliferations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, the problem with all these studies is that there is no proof that the surface proliferation really represents primary in‐situ disease rather than surface spread of invasive disease. Indeed, we have reported previously 18 cases of invasive mesothelioma that had an accompanying surface growth (mainly multilayered rather than single mesothelial cells) and showed that CDKN2A FISH give identical fractions of deleted cells in the invasive and surface components, supporting the idea that such proliferations were probably surface spread of the underlying tumour. Further, none of these reports provides morphological criteria that allow separation of (putative) MIS from reactive mesothelial proliferations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…A recent study confirmed that p16 deletion is a good marker of malignancy, both in pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas with invasive components [53]. A common chromosomal deletion was detected at 5q32, containing the Cdkn2a gene, and a homozygous deletion was observed in the majority of cases from epithelioid to sarcomatoid and biphasic mesotheliomas [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The overall sensitivity of p16 FISH has been reported to be between 56% and 79%, and, notably, the positive predictive value and specificity are both 100% . Detection of homozygous p16 deletion by FISH seems to be feasible and helpful in confirming a diagnosis of mesothelioma in cytologic and surgical specimens …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using an appropriate panel of IHC/ICC markers, cells of mesothelial origin can be readily distinguished from pleural metastases of other primary carcinomas in most cases. However, there is still no reliable marker separating benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations with sufficient sensitivity and specificity …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation