P16. Influence of CT contrast agent on head and neck VMAT dose distributions using Acuros XB® algorithm

Obeid, L.; Molinier, J.; Aillères, N.; Bedos, L.; Morel, A.; Simeon, S.; Fénoglietto, P.

doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.028

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In IMRT plans based on both CCT and manually created NCCT, dose differences were insignificant for targets and critical structures. In another virtual CCT study, Li et al [24] replaced blood vessels and heart HU values in NCCT images of 22 esophageal cancer patients with higher values up to 445 HU. IMRT and 3DCRT plans were recalculated for comparison.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Contrast Agents on Dose Calculations of Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy Plans for Critical Structures

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radiotherapy dose calculation requires accurate Computed Tomography (CT) imaging while tissue delineation may necessitate the use of contrast agents (CA). Acquiring these two sets is a common practice in radiotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the effect of CA on the dose calculations. Two hundred and twenty-six volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) patients that had planning CT with contrast (CCT) and non-contrast CT (NCCT) of different cancer sites (e.g., brain, head, and neck (H&N), chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were evaluated. Treatment plans were recalculated using CCT, then compared to NCCT. The variation in Hounsfield units (HU) and dose distributions for critical structures and target volumes were analyzed using mean HU, mean and maximum relative dose values, D2%, D98%, and 3D gamma analysis. HU variations were statistically significant for most structures. However, this was not clinically significant as the difference in mean HU values was within 30 HU for soft tissue and 50 HU for lungs. Variation in target volumes’ D2% and D98% were insignificant for all sites except brain and nasopharynx. Dose maximum differences were within 2% for the majority of critical structures and target volumes. 3D gamma analysis results revealed that majority of plans satisfied the 2% and 2 mm criteria. CCT may be acquired for VMAT radiotherapy planning purposes instead of NCCT, since there is no clinically significant difference in dose calculations based on either image set.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%