2005
DOI: 10.1080/00313020500058607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p16iNK4a as a complementary marker of high-grade intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. I: Experience with squamous lesions in 189 consecutive cervical biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
53
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…5), as compared to the keratinizing type carcinomas of the same site [6,7,22]. This immunohistochemical profile is analogous to that seen in HPV positive anogenital carcinomas [23][24][25]. As mentioned above the majority of oropharyngeal HPVrelated lesions start at the bottom of the crypts of the palatine and lingual tonsils, and thus are inaccessible to routine cytologic smears.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…5), as compared to the keratinizing type carcinomas of the same site [6,7,22]. This immunohistochemical profile is analogous to that seen in HPV positive anogenital carcinomas [23][24][25]. As mentioned above the majority of oropharyngeal HPVrelated lesions start at the bottom of the crypts of the palatine and lingual tonsils, and thus are inaccessible to routine cytologic smears.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In our study, we observed good correlation between p16 INK4A immunohistochemical staining and a consensus pathological diagnosis of CIN 2,31, consistent with what has been shown previously in the literature. 7,9,29 Using archival tissue we observed some heterogeneity of p16 INK4a staining in CIN 2,31, which may reflect either variations in the degree of overexpression of p16 INK4a within the lesions or variability in antigen retrieval. Lesions that were classified as CIN 2,31 on consensus pathology but that were p16 INK4A -negative had histological features suggestive of immature squamous metaplasia and did not recur after treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In general, a strong association between finding high levels of p16 INK4a within a lesion by immunohistochemical staining and a diagnosis of CIN 2,3 has been found. 7,9,29 Immunohistochemical staining of cervical biopsies for p16 INK4a can reduce interobserver variation in their histolopathologic interpretation. 23 Moreover, women with cervical biopsies that are p16 INK4a -positive but not diagnosed as CIN 2,3 are at greatly elevated risk for subsequently being diagnosed with CIN 2,3 and women with p16 INK4a -negative CIN 1 lesions are less likely to progress to CIN 3 than those with p16 INK4a -positive CIN 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result probably represents the highest limit as compared to the findings of others. Intensive parabasal staining for p16 antigen was described in not more than 47% of CIN I cases, but continuous positive staining of lower intensity was reported in over 70% of CIN I cases [40,41]. Summing up the results of antigen p16 staining in the biopsy sections graded CIN I/LSIL, Yildiz et al [42] recognized continuous parabasal staining of high intensity, continuous parabasal staining of lower intensity and scattered staining of dispersed squamous epithelium cells.…”
Section: Overexpression Of the P16/ink4a Polypeptide In Hpv Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%