2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p16INK4A genetic and epigenetic profiles differ in relation to age and site in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
50
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for further analysis. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] The main reasons for exclusion were duplicates and studies not investigating correlation between HPV status and methylation status in OPSCC.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for further analysis. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] The main reasons for exclusion were duplicates and studies not investigating correlation between HPV status and methylation status in OPSCC.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,33,34,44 In other publications studying overall HNSCC, OPSCC subgroup size ranged from 9% to 80% of the total study population. [29][30][31][32][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] There was only one study that reported the distribution of average age, nicotine and alcohol consumption between HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors of which promoter methylation was evaluated. 34 The mean age in HPV-positive tumors was 56.9 compared with 58.4 in HPV-negative tumors.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It seems more likely these patients they are both, falling into three major groups: (1) those in the 40-45 age group who report a very high level of risk factor exposure, a part of the spectrum seen in older patients; (2) males with oropharyngeal cancer, many non-smokers, some of whom are \45 but most of whom are somewhat older, who are an emerging group related to high risk HPV infection; (3) a third distinct group of \40 year olds, usually female non-smokers, with oral cancer. It had been suggested that HPV must be a factor in the latter group, but El Mofty [8] and O'Regan [17] indicate otherwise. In the midst of the avalanche of HPV literature, it is important to note this group of young patients in whom HPV is not a factor; it may also be important in this context to re-examine the long recognised group of older females, without usual risk factors, with oral cancer, the aetiology of which remains unclear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%