2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.09.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P2.23 Characterization of Hispanic Patients Who Experienced Hyperprogression During Treatment for Advanced NSCLC with Immunotherapy

Abstract: Background: Hispanics in the US have a lower age-adjusted mortality in NSCLC and may have a different gene expression profile than NHWs. Additional data is thus needed to validate outcomes in Hispanic patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs. Our aim was to compare clinical outcomes between Hispanic and NHW patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs at 5 large institutions in the US and Latin America. Method: Retrospective clinical review on 436 Hispanic pts with advanced NSCLC that had failed at least one pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this study also reported a lower overall response rate in Hispanics versus NHWs in patients receiving second-line therapy (18% v 19%), patients with adenocarcinomas (22% v 24%), and patients with PD-L1–positive tumors (29% v 32%); however, none of these differences were statistically significant. Another study, the Quijote study, 26 include 296 Hispanic patients (from México, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Panama, Colombia, Peru, the United States, and Argentina) with NSCLC treated with immunotherapy in the first-, second-, or third-line or greater setting (13.7%, 48.8%, and 37.6% of patients, respectively). Within this population, the median OS was 19.9 months (95% CI, 14.5 to 22.7 months), and median PFS was 3.73 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.2 months).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, this study also reported a lower overall response rate in Hispanics versus NHWs in patients receiving second-line therapy (18% v 19%), patients with adenocarcinomas (22% v 24%), and patients with PD-L1–positive tumors (29% v 32%); however, none of these differences were statistically significant. Another study, the Quijote study, 26 include 296 Hispanic patients (from México, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Panama, Colombia, Peru, the United States, and Argentina) with NSCLC treated with immunotherapy in the first-, second-, or third-line or greater setting (13.7%, 48.8%, and 37.6% of patients, respectively). Within this population, the median OS was 19.9 months (95% CI, 14.5 to 22.7 months), and median PFS was 3.73 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.2 months).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with a historical cohort, immunotherapy proved to be superior in terms of OS ( P = .05) but not PFS ( P = .2). The Quijote study 26 also documented 44 patients with hyperprogressive disease (19.8%; 95% CI, 14.5% to 25.1%) who had a median time to progression after immunotherapy of approximately 5 weeks. Factors associated with worst outcomes among Hispanic patients with hyperprogressive disease included albumin and hemoglobin levels, presence of CNS and bone metastasis, and weight loss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study reports that overall response to cCRT positively impacts the OS, and the benefit is higher for NHW than for Hispanics (34.9 months vs. 29.2 months, respectively). Previously, some studies documented that complete or partial response to the treatment relates directly to an increased OS ( 25 , 26 ). In this scenario, the outcome is still better for NHW despite the grade of response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%