2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P20. Thoracoscopic anterior versus open posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional advantages include more rapid recovery, improved cosmesis, smaller scar, less impact on pulmonary function and shoulder function when compared to thoracotomy, and less blood loss than with the posterior approach. 3,8 The disadvantages of the procedure include the expense of the new equipment required for the endoscopic procedure. As noted by Newton et al, 9 the increase in cost associated with thoracoscopic surgery is largely a result of the cost of thoracoscopic instrumentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional advantages include more rapid recovery, improved cosmesis, smaller scar, less impact on pulmonary function and shoulder function when compared to thoracotomy, and less blood loss than with the posterior approach. 3,8 The disadvantages of the procedure include the expense of the new equipment required for the endoscopic procedure. As noted by Newton et al, 9 the increase in cost associated with thoracoscopic surgery is largely a result of the cost of thoracoscopic instrumentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%