2019
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P300 Speller Performance Predictor Based on RSVP Multi-feature

Abstract: Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems were developed so that people can control computers or machines through their brain activity without moving their limbs. The P300 speller is one of the BCI applications used most commonly, as is very simple and reliable and can achieve satisfactory performance. However, like other BCIs, the P300 speller still has room for improvements in terms of its practical use, for example, selecting the best compromise between spelling accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR; spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RSVP systems ( Ratcliffe and Puthusserypady, 2020 ) were proposed to solve this problem, but the defect of these protocols was the long duration of the experiment time that deteriorates the ITR and lowers accuracy. Many scholars have done extensive research on improving the performance of BCI, such as creating a P300 speller performance predictor based on RSVP multifeature ( Won et al, 2019 ), finding the optimal features ( Yin et al, 2015 , 2016 ; Won et al, 2018 ), and using deep neural network algorithm ( Zhao et al, 2020 ), which cannot have a better result in a large subject study. In our study, the average ITR of the RSVP speller is 43.18 bits/min, which is 13% higher than the matrix paradigm, and we achieved the better accuracy results at present in a large subject study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSVP systems ( Ratcliffe and Puthusserypady, 2020 ) were proposed to solve this problem, but the defect of these protocols was the long duration of the experiment time that deteriorates the ITR and lowers accuracy. Many scholars have done extensive research on improving the performance of BCI, such as creating a P300 speller performance predictor based on RSVP multifeature ( Won et al, 2019 ), finding the optimal features ( Yin et al, 2015 , 2016 ; Won et al, 2018 ), and using deep neural network algorithm ( Zhao et al, 2020 ), which cannot have a better result in a large subject study. In our study, the average ITR of the RSVP speller is 43.18 bits/min, which is 13% higher than the matrix paradigm, and we achieved the better accuracy results at present in a large subject study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works have reported single-trial classification rates in the order of 0.8 (see Reference [ 58 , 59 , 65 ]). The classification rates reported are similar to those achieved in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the effect of stimulation condition and of the number of symbols on the single-trial classification between target and non-target responses was assessed through a five-fold cross-validation process. Although there exist a sample overlapping, this performance evaluation approach is quite acceptable to estimate the online performance of the BCI [ 58 , 59 ]. Here, all the epochs in a given dataset were randomly allocated into five sets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, human-centered BCIs, such as those in mental fatigue detection tasks (Binias et al, 2020 ; Ko et al, 2020b ), emotion recognition (Qing et al, 2019 ), and controlling exoskeletons (Lee et al, 2017 ) have shed light on the success of improving human ability. An active BCI (Fahimi et al, 2020 ) recognizes complex patterns from EEG spontaneously caused by a user's intention independent of external stimuli, and a reactive BCI (Won et al, 2019 ) identifies brain activities in reaction to external events. A Passive BCI (Ko et al, 2020b ) is exploited to acquire implicit information of a user's cognitive status without any voluntary control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%