2017
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx504.p3373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P3373Better health-related quality of life in patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril, irrespective of NYHA class: Analysis of EQ-5D in PARADIGM-HF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 For the QALY calculations, EQ-5D utility values from PARADIGM-HF were used, since no German-specific utilities were found in the literature. 50,51 The baseline utility value was 0.78, a disutility value of 0.21 was used for hospitalized patients and for sacubitril/valsartan treatment a utility benefit of 0.011 was incorporated. 50,51 Time horizon and discounting A 30-year time horizon was used to approach a lifetime horizon, with a starting age of 64.…”
Section: Health Outcomes and Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 For the QALY calculations, EQ-5D utility values from PARADIGM-HF were used, since no German-specific utilities were found in the literature. 50,51 The baseline utility value was 0.78, a disutility value of 0.21 was used for hospitalized patients and for sacubitril/valsartan treatment a utility benefit of 0.011 was incorporated. 50,51 Time horizon and discounting A 30-year time horizon was used to approach a lifetime horizon, with a starting age of 64.…”
Section: Health Outcomes and Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50,51 The baseline utility value was 0.78, a disutility value of 0.21 was used for hospitalized patients and for sacubitril/valsartan treatment a utility benefit of 0.011 was incorporated. 50,51 Time horizon and discounting A 30-year time horizon was used to approach a lifetime horizon, with a starting age of 64. Both costs and effects were discounted at 3%, with 0% and 5% used in scenarios, in line with the German guidelines.…”
Section: Health Outcomes and Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of data by NYHA class clearly illustrates the impact of the severity of chronic HF on utility values. The SLR identified 11 publications that provided data on mean EQ-5D utility values according to NYHA class, of which nine were included in the IQL calculation; one study was omitted from the IQL calculation as it grouped NYHA classes (I/II and III/IV), and a second study was omitted because it published the mean difference in utility values between classes [33,34]. Aside from Zhu et al [30], which reported lower utility values for NYHA I vs NYHA class II, increasing NYHA class was associated with lower utility values ( The impact of a value set on the utility value is illustrated in two publications.…”
Section: Utility Values In Patients With Chronic Hfmentioning
confidence: 99%