Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. Reperfusion therapy is strongly associated with the prognosis of STEMI and must be performed with a high standard of quality and without delay. A systematic review of different reperfusion strategies for STEMI was conducted, including randomized controlled trials that included major cardiovascular events (MACE), and systematic reviews in the last 5 years through the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) methodology. The research was done in the PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, in addition to a few manual searches. After the exclusion criteria were applied, 90 articles were selected for this review. Despite the reestablishment of IRA patency in PCI for STEMI, microvascular lesions occur in a significant proportion of these patients, which can compromise ventricular function and clinical course. Several therapeutic strategies -intracoronary administration of nicorandil, nitrates, melatonin, antioxidant drugs (quercetin, glutathione), antiinflammatory substances (tocilizumab [an inhibitor of interleukin 6], inclacumab, P-selectin inhibitor), immunosuppressants (cyclosporine), erythropoietin and ischemic pre-and post-conditioning and stem cell therapy -have been tested to reduce reperfusion injury, ventricular remodeling and serious cardiovascular events, with heterogeneous results: These therapies need confirmation in larger studies to be implemented in clinical practice PrevalenceThe worldwide prevalence of ischemic heart disease is approximately 111 million cases, with 7.3 million cases of fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 2015. The inadequate treatment of patients with AMI is associated with significant increases in morbidity and mortality. 1 ObjectivesThe objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence of different reperfusion therapies in STsegment elevation AMI (STEMI), selecting mainly randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews that address major cardiovascular clinical outcomes. MethodsThe review was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). We searched the PubMed database for the terms "acute myocardial infarction" and "reperfusion therapy", which yielded 9,885 results. After applying the following search filters -type of abstract: "text and full text"; type of article: "metaanalysis, review, systematic review and randomized clinical trial", and date of publication: "last 5 years", and language: "English" -127 articles were obtained. In addition, research was conducted at the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the terms "acute myocardial infarction" and "reperfusion therapy", in English, between 2018 and 2020, which revealed 64 clinical trials, already excluding duplicates. Of the 191
ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. Reperfusion therapy is strongly associated with the prognosis of STEMI and must be performed with a high standard of quality and without delay. A systematic review of different reperfusion strategies for STEMI was conducted, including randomized controlled trials that included major cardiovascular events (MACE), and systematic reviews in the last 5 years through the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) methodology. The research was done in the PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, in addition to a few manual searches. After the exclusion criteria were applied, 90 articles were selected for this review. Despite the reestablishment of IRA patency in PCI for STEMI, microvascular lesions occur in a significant proportion of these patients, which can compromise ventricular function and clinical course. Several therapeutic strategies -intracoronary administration of nicorandil, nitrates, melatonin, antioxidant drugs (quercetin, glutathione), antiinflammatory substances (tocilizumab [an inhibitor of interleukin 6], inclacumab, P-selectin inhibitor), immunosuppressants (cyclosporine), erythropoietin and ischemic pre-and post-conditioning and stem cell therapy -have been tested to reduce reperfusion injury, ventricular remodeling and serious cardiovascular events, with heterogeneous results: These therapies need confirmation in larger studies to be implemented in clinical practice PrevalenceThe worldwide prevalence of ischemic heart disease is approximately 111 million cases, with 7.3 million cases of fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 2015. The inadequate treatment of patients with AMI is associated with significant increases in morbidity and mortality. 1 ObjectivesThe objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence of different reperfusion therapies in STsegment elevation AMI (STEMI), selecting mainly randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews that address major cardiovascular clinical outcomes. MethodsThe review was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). We searched the PubMed database for the terms "acute myocardial infarction" and "reperfusion therapy", which yielded 9,885 results. After applying the following search filters -type of abstract: "text and full text"; type of article: "metaanalysis, review, systematic review and randomized clinical trial", and date of publication: "last 5 years", and language: "English" -127 articles were obtained. In addition, research was conducted at the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the terms "acute myocardial infarction" and "reperfusion therapy", in English, between 2018 and 2020, which revealed 64 clinical trials, already excluding duplicates. Of the 191
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.