2013
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.424655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

p53 and Translation Attenuation Regulate Distinct Cell Cycle Checkpoints during Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress

Abstract: Background: ER stress impairs progression through G 1 and G 2 phases of the cell cycle. Results: G 2 arrest is enhanced in p53 mutant cells but is not enhanced by expression of the p53/47 isoform. Conclusion: Early G 2 arrest in ER stress is a response to translation attenuation. Significance: Understanding cell cycle regulation in ER stress has implications for rational cancer therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cells may arrest either in G1 or G2 (Thomas, et al, 2013). G2 arrest is mediated downstream of PERK activation, through CHK1 activation, a potent cell cycle inhibitor also known for its activation in response to DNA damage (Malzer, et al, 2010, Thomas, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Effects Of Er Stress Activators On Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cells may arrest either in G1 or G2 (Thomas, et al, 2013). G2 arrest is mediated downstream of PERK activation, through CHK1 activation, a potent cell cycle inhibitor also known for its activation in response to DNA damage (Malzer, et al, 2010, Thomas, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Effects Of Er Stress Activators On Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells may arrest either in G1 or G2 (Thomas, et al, 2013). G2 arrest is mediated downstream of PERK activation, through CHK1 activation, a potent cell cycle inhibitor also known for its activation in response to DNA damage (Malzer, et al, 2010, Thomas, et al, 2013). Cell cycle arrest in G1 occurs secondarily following activation of PERK, which can diminish synthesis of cyclin D1 (Brewer and Diehl, 2000, Thomas, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Effects Of Er Stress Activators On Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a recent report provided evidence suggesting that UPR signaling modulates the function of a p53 isoform ( 122 ). In addition, ER stress may affect the cell cycle and protein translation in a p53-dependent manner ( 123,124 ). p53 is also a relevant mediator of ER stress-dependent apoptosis through the transcriptional upregulation of the BCL2 family members PUMA and NOXA ( 125 ), and, interestingly, p53-defi cient mice exhibit constitutive ER stress ( 120 ).…”
Section: Er Stress and Dna Damage/repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-talk between the UPR and p53 has been reported in many studies (see examples in refs. [122][123][124][125], which may infl uence gene expression toward cell adaptation or induction of apoptosis, and thus determine cancer cell fate. For example, a recent report provided evidence suggesting that UPR signaling modulates the function of a p53 isoform ( 122 ).…”
Section: Er Stress and Dna Damage/repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mild phenotypes have been observed when only one copy of the H99 locus remains[3034] but homozygotic mutants abolish virtually all apoptosis [1719, 35]. Conversely, induction of IAP-antagonists in response to DNA damage or stress (proteotoxicity, viral infection, etc) is mediated by p53, overexpression of which can be used to induce cell death[36, 37]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%