2016
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw383.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P53 non-disruptive mutation is a negative predictive factor in EGFR M+ NSCLC treated with TKI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, TP53 concurrent mutations were associated with a markedly shorter time to progression and OS on initial EGFR-TKIs, as well as reduced DCR and ORR to TKI therapy. In addition, we found that non-disruptive mutations of the p53 gene are an independent factor of shorter survival in advanced NSCLC with a possible predictive negative value of response to TKIs; the same conclusions could be seen in two previously published studies 30 , 31. However, the molecular pathogenesis is still unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, TP53 concurrent mutations were associated with a markedly shorter time to progression and OS on initial EGFR-TKIs, as well as reduced DCR and ORR to TKI therapy. In addition, we found that non-disruptive mutations of the p53 gene are an independent factor of shorter survival in advanced NSCLC with a possible predictive negative value of response to TKIs; the same conclusions could be seen in two previously published studies 30 , 31. However, the molecular pathogenesis is still unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Given that different types of TP53 genetic mutations tend to have different effects on the functionality of the protein, we classified TP53 mutations into disruptive/non-disruptive, missense/non-missense mutations as well as mutations in different sites based on previous studies (Table 5). 5 , 2931 In contrast to TP53 disruptive mutations, TP53 non-disruptive mutations demonstrate greater potency in shortening mPFS and OS of the patients (PFS: 6.3 versus 14.0 months, P =0.028; HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.06–5.32, P <0.030; OS: 35.0 versus 52.5 months, P =0.008; HR 5.00, 95%CI 1.38–18.18, P =0.008) when compared with TP53-wt controls (Figure 2A and B, Tables S2 and S3 ). Similar conclusions could be made on TP53 non-missense mutations: patients with non-missense mutations showed shorter PFS and OS (mPFS: 6.3 versus 14 months, P =0.041; HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.00–4.05, P =0.046; mOS: 21.2 versus 52.5 months, P =0.001; HR 5.53, 95% CI 1.79–16.95 P =0.001) than that of TP53-wt cases (Figure 2C and D, Tables S2 and S3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional significance of TP53 nondisruptive mutations remains elusive; however, experimental evidence has suggested that they often are associated with gain‐of‐functional activities with PD and poor clinical outcomes 41‐43 . It is important to note that the presence of nondisruptive TP53 mutations was found to be significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with metastatic EGFR ‐mutant NSCLC who were treated with EGFR TKIs, which is consistent with the current study findings regarding the predictive role of disruptive TP53 mutations in patients with R/M‐ESCC who were treated with EGFR TKIs 44,45 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our data confirm that EGFR mutated cancers have different mutational backgrounds and raise the question of the clinical impact of intertumor heterogeneity to predict first line response and secondary resistance mechanisms. Previous works suggested links between TP53 mutations [15] or sub-groups of TP53 mutations and low OS or PFS [20][21][22]. Here no association between TP53 mutations (or mutation subgroups) and clinical data was identified, contrasting with results published by Griesinger et al that suggested an impact of non-disruptive mutations on PFS.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%