2019
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz746.0443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P5490Sex-related differences in intrahospital outcome of patients undergoing PCI

Abstract: Background Cardiovascular diseases remain the number one cause of mortality in the world despite modern scientific and therapeutic advancement. Gender difference pathophysiology, treatment and outcome have been hypothesized and studied. Whether there are sex differences in the outcome after PCI remains controversial. Aim of the study We undertook this study to assess whether there are sex-related differences in intrahospital … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, during the “normal” 2019 year, compared to males, females subjected to the so-called gender paradox of coronary disease tended to present later (424.72 ± 352.6 versus 467.46 ± 457.63), had worse outcomes, had higher mortality (6.0% versus 2.5%; p = 0.01), but tended to have smaller coronary disease extent (more than one-vessel CAD, less than two and three-vessel CAD) and better ejection fraction (50.68 ± 11.33 vs. 51.65 ± 12.40) (Table 5 ). The paradox of coronary disease is described in other studies conducted worldwide [ 24 ] and previously in Albania [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In our study, during the “normal” 2019 year, compared to males, females subjected to the so-called gender paradox of coronary disease tended to present later (424.72 ± 352.6 versus 467.46 ± 457.63), had worse outcomes, had higher mortality (6.0% versus 2.5%; p = 0.01), but tended to have smaller coronary disease extent (more than one-vessel CAD, less than two and three-vessel CAD) and better ejection fraction (50.68 ± 11.33 vs. 51.65 ± 12.40) (Table 5 ). The paradox of coronary disease is described in other studies conducted worldwide [ 24 ] and previously in Albania [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%