2010
DOI: 10.1016/s2210-7789(10)60174-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P8 Mid-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in prediction of preeclampsia in high risk women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several investigators have suggested that diastolic notch in the uterine artery as a single parameter is better than the individual Doppler indices 15,17,18 , while others are more in favour of using the PI 12,19 .Given the technological improvements in the Doppler hardware and software 20 , ultimately the ability to measure accurately the increased impedance to uterine artery flow in both high risk and low risk pregnancies becomes crucial to predict the risk for subsequent development of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. The findings from this research show that women with normal impedance to flow in the uterine arteries constitute a group that have a low risk (negative predictive value for pre-eclampsia is 99% and for SGA < 5th percentile is 93%) of developing obstetric complications related to Uteroplacental insufficiency, as observed by others 14,21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several investigators have suggested that diastolic notch in the uterine artery as a single parameter is better than the individual Doppler indices 15,17,18 , while others are more in favour of using the PI 12,19 .Given the technological improvements in the Doppler hardware and software 20 , ultimately the ability to measure accurately the increased impedance to uterine artery flow in both high risk and low risk pregnancies becomes crucial to predict the risk for subsequent development of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. The findings from this research show that women with normal impedance to flow in the uterine arteries constitute a group that have a low risk (negative predictive value for pre-eclampsia is 99% and for SGA < 5th percentile is 93%) of developing obstetric complications related to Uteroplacental insufficiency, as observed by others 14,21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Over the past two decades, several investigators have explored the validity of Uterine artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms as predictors of pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and adverse perinatal outcomes notches, increased pulsality indices 2,7,8. Yet, there has been no consensus on several aspects of Doppler ultrasonography in terms of the best time for assessment, the optimal outcome parameters, cut-off thresholds to obtain maximum predictive powers, and relationship of prediction to prevalence of the adverse events 13,14 . The findings of the present study done several years ago in south India seem still valid in terms of the timing, parameters and optimal screening efficacies (Table 1 and 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We demonstrated abnormal PI in uterine arteries in 62.7 % of fetuses from pregnancy induced hypertension, 30 % of fetuses with FGR, and 4.5 % of fetuses with antepartal hemorrhage (Table 12), which was in concordance with previous studies [4,5] . According to a study by Pongrojpaw et al, in high-risk women, mid-trimester uterine artery Doppler waveform analysis cannot be used as a screening method in women at higher risk for the development of severe adverse outcome, such as pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age babies [25] . However, women with normal uterine artery Doppler results are unlikely to develop pre-eclampsia, FGR, and therefore do not necessarily need repeated Doppler ultrasound follow-up [25] .…”
Section: Umbilical Arteries (Uas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a study by Pongrojpaw et al, in high-risk women, mid-trimester uterine artery Doppler waveform analysis cannot be used as a screening method in women at higher risk for the development of severe adverse outcome, such as pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age babies [25] . However, women with normal uterine artery Doppler results are unlikely to develop pre-eclampsia, FGR, and therefore do not necessarily need repeated Doppler ultrasound follow-up [25] .…”
Section: Umbilical Arteries (Uas)mentioning
confidence: 99%