2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-005-0047-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) and salmon: genetics presents hard numbers for elucidating predator-prey dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() and Kvitrud et al . () who concluded it was probably due to differences in the DNA template for each run. This indicates that there is some stochasticity involved, which may have been exacerbated by relatively small subgroup sample sizes, a known issue with this type of data collection (Greenstone et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…() and Kvitrud et al . () who concluded it was probably due to differences in the DNA template for each run. This indicates that there is some stochasticity involved, which may have been exacerbated by relatively small subgroup sample sizes, a known issue with this type of data collection (Greenstone et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Kvitrud et al . ). Designated nonadjacent areas of the laboratory were used for pre‐ and post‐PCR procedures (see Appendix S4, Supporting information for details of individual feeding trials and prey identification outcomes for individual stomach and faecal samples).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The majority of genetic diet studies carried out on vertebrates have focused on identification of prey tissue remains recovered from stomach contents [e.g. 9], [18] or hard parts in faeces [19], [20]. The approach has also been applied to more highly processed amorphous faecal material in some instances [e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear whether this is due to salmonids forming a small part of the diet, or the result of salmonid otoliths being under‐represented compared with those of other species (Boyle, Pierce & Diack 1990). An additional problem occurs where it is difficult to distinguish between closely related salmonid species once the hard parts have been subject to digestion (Kvitrud et al . 2005; Middlemas et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%