2004
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.20156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pacinian corpuscle development involves multiple Trk signaling pathways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pacinian corpuscles and Ruffini endings, typically identifiable with hematoxylin and eosin staining alone, were not observed despite close examination along the phalange, metatarsal, and tarsal bones of the hind paw. Previous histological investigations have confirmed the absence of Ruffini-like structures in the forepaw digit of the raccoon (Rice and Rasmusson, 2000) and have identified Pacinian corpuscles in forelimb phalanges, radius, ulna, fibula, tibia, and interosseous membranes of mice (Zelená, 1978;Sedý et al, 2004;Prsa et al, 2019), but not in the hind paw. Though, we cannot discount that our sampling approach [every third slide (88 µm)] may have missed these receptors that are few in number and ∼50 µm in diameter (Prsa et al, 2019), it would make sense functionally that feedback regarding the high-frequency vibrations of phalanges in the forepaw may be critical for feeding and grooming, but not in the hind paw for sitting and gait (Hunt, 1961).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Pacinian corpuscles and Ruffini endings, typically identifiable with hematoxylin and eosin staining alone, were not observed despite close examination along the phalange, metatarsal, and tarsal bones of the hind paw. Previous histological investigations have confirmed the absence of Ruffini-like structures in the forepaw digit of the raccoon (Rice and Rasmusson, 2000) and have identified Pacinian corpuscles in forelimb phalanges, radius, ulna, fibula, tibia, and interosseous membranes of mice (Zelená, 1978;Sedý et al, 2004;Prsa et al, 2019), but not in the hind paw. Though, we cannot discount that our sampling approach [every third slide (88 µm)] may have missed these receptors that are few in number and ∼50 µm in diameter (Prsa et al, 2019), it would make sense functionally that feedback regarding the high-frequency vibrations of phalanges in the forepaw may be critical for feeding and grooming, but not in the hind paw for sitting and gait (Hunt, 1961).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The DRG markers consist of NF-200 (mechanoreceptors and proprioreceptors with large axon diameters), parvalbumin (proprioceptors), TrkA (small and medium diameter unmyelinated nociceptors and mechanoreceptors), CGRP (peptidergic nociceptors), IB4 (nonpeptidergic nociceptors), and peripherin (nociceptors and mechanoreceptors). TrkA is expressed in and required for the development of both peptidergic nociceptors (Marmigère and Ernfors, 2007) and a variety of mechanoreceptors (Fundin et al, 1997b; Cronk et al, 2002; Sedý et al, 2004). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The firing of Pacinians across the step cycle led us to ask how mechanical stimuli move through the body. In the hindlimb, Pacinians are most often found at the base of the fibula 9,32 , suggesting that vibration propagates through the bone and tissue of the ankle to activate Pacinians. Could footfalls from the contralateral foot propagate through the body’s skeletal system to activate Pacinians?…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These externally generated stimuli were often How do vibrations propagate through the mouse to activate Pacinians? In the hindlimb, Pacinians are most often found at the base of the fibula 42,43 , suggesting that vibration propagates through the bone and tissue of the ankle to activate Pacinians. Given their sensitivity to both internally generated movement and upper body movements, we asked whether hindlimb Pacinians could also detect vibrations that propagate from either the contralateral hindlimb or the forelimbs.…”
Section: Detection Of Externally Generated Vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%