Critical Education 2018
DOI: 10.14288/ce.v9i16.186415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packaging Girls for STEM or STEM for Girls? A critique on the perceived crisis of increasing female representation in STEM education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low representation of girls in STEM, and more specifically in technology, is a common and certainly not recent phenomenon (Chesky and Goldstein, 2018;Eccles and Jacobs, 1986;Rosenwald, 2006). Over the past 30 years, researchers have dedicated themselves to studying these differences in career choice (Wang, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low representation of girls in STEM, and more specifically in technology, is a common and certainly not recent phenomenon (Chesky and Goldstein, 2018;Eccles and Jacobs, 1986;Rosenwald, 2006). Over the past 30 years, researchers have dedicated themselves to studying these differences in career choice (Wang, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%