2013
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2012.736620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packing theory-based framework to evaluate permanent deformation of unbound granular materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameter a as a function of moisture content for the different materials. Rahman and S. Erlingsson Birgisson, & Jelagin, 2013;Yideti, Birgisson, Jelagin, & Guarin, 2012). This needs further investigation.…”
Section: Influence Of Grain Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Parameter a as a function of moisture content for the different materials. Rahman and S. Erlingsson Birgisson, & Jelagin, 2013;Yideti, Birgisson, Jelagin, & Guarin, 2012). This needs further investigation.…”
Section: Influence Of Grain Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For gravel UGM, an optimum fines content of 9% showed better resistance to permanent deformation than 4% and 14.5% fines contents. The permanent deformation behavior will be evaluated at a later stage of this research according to the packing theory based framework developed by Yideti et al (2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a newly constructed granular base layer is not stress-free (Uzan, 1985). Yideti et al (2013) presented a framework based on packing theory to evaluate the permanent deformation behavior of UGM. The framework introduced the disruption potential (DP), which is defined as the ratio of the volume of potentially disruptive fine material over the volume of voids within the coarse aggregate forming load-carrying skeleton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The load-carrying structure in an asphalt mixture is determined using the framework presented by Lira et al (2013) for asphalt mixtures and Yideti et al (2012) for unbound materials. The framework identifies two different structures within the aggregates: primary structure (PS) and secondary structure (SS).…”
Section: Packing-based Bitumen Distribution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%