2018
DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v10n5p62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain Assessment in People With Dementia: Remaining Controversies

Abstract: Background: Pain in people with dementia is under recognized, underestimated, and under-treated due to the complexity of pain assessment in this population. Summary: Self-report tools are the gold standard of pain assessment. However, people with dementia are not always able to clearly and meaningfully self-report their pain. Self-report tools capture the affective experience of pain, which is impaired in people with dementia. Observational pain tools are more useful to assess pain especially in people with ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work underscores the importance of understanding biological differences in pain processing when evaluating differences in pain reporting in AD. Findings furthermore support the use of multi-dimensional pain assessment practices ( 87 ) and tools ( 88 ) since most clinicians and clinical systems use a simple 0–10 scale assessing only the sensory rather than affective component of pain ( 89 , 90 ). This work suggests alternative assessment strategies to better capture altered pain responses in AD, reducing the potential for poorly managed pain and unnecessary suffering in this population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work underscores the importance of understanding biological differences in pain processing when evaluating differences in pain reporting in AD. Findings furthermore support the use of multi-dimensional pain assessment practices ( 87 ) and tools ( 88 ) since most clinicians and clinical systems use a simple 0–10 scale assessing only the sensory rather than affective component of pain ( 89 , 90 ). This work suggests alternative assessment strategies to better capture altered pain responses in AD, reducing the potential for poorly managed pain and unnecessary suffering in this population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Results indicating greater activation in AD participants relative to controls in the PAG for the contrast comparison of warmth greater than prestimulus (left) and mild pain greater than baseline (right). and clinical systems use a simple 0-10 scale assessing only the sensory rather than affective component of pain (89,90). This work suggests alternative assessment strategies to better capture altered pain responses in AD, reducing the potential for poorly managed pain and unnecessary suffering in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PAINAD scale is a tool of acknowledged utility for the assessment of pain in people with cognitive impairment and communication inability 46…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These definitions appear to be built on the assumption that individuals experiencing pain have the capacity at some level to communicate their pain. This is not always the case, as self-report is often ineffective for noncommunicative individuals and those unable to understand a pain scale because of memory loss or cognitive impairment (Cravello et al, 2019;Hadjistavropoulos et al, 2014;Monroe & Mion, 2012;Rababa, 2018b). The ASPMN acknowledges this issue, as demonstrated in one of their recent position statements (Herr et al, 2019).…”
Section: Pain Assessment and Management In Alzheimer Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a pain behavior is absent, such as in the presence of pathological disorders or adverse drug effects (Monroe et al, 2012a;Paulson et al, 2014), or unnoticed (Cohen-Mansfield & Creedon, 2002) at the time of observation, observational scales may be ineffective (Monroe & Mion, 2012). Despite multiple studies, there is still controversy about which behaviors truly indicate pain rather than another unmet need (Rababa, 2018a(Rababa, , 2018b, although recent studies may improve our understanding (Kunz et al, 2020b). Additionally, behavioral changes can be misunderstood or misinterpreted by nursing staff (McAuliffe et al, 2009;Rababa, 2018a), and beliefs and expectations held by nurses affect the interpretation of pain behaviors (Rantala, 2014).…”
Section: Pain Assessment and Management In Alzheimer Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%