Pain assessment tools in palliative care: an urgent need for consensus

Abstract

At present, there is no universally accepted cancer pain assessment tool for use in palliative care (PC). The European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC), therefore, aims to develop an international consensus-based computerised pain assessment tool. As part of this process, we have performed (1) a literature review on pain assessment tools for use in the PC and (2) an international expert survey to gain information on the relevant dimensions for pain assessment in PC. 230 publications were identified, only six met the inclusion criteria. Three further articles were identified through manual searching, totalling 11 different pain assessment tools. Nine tools were multidimensional. Pain intensity was assessed in seven, using various numerical/verbal rating scales (NRS/VRS); five tools focused on pain management. Three publications did not identify the rationale for the need to develop a new tool, and the selection procedure for items/dimensions was not described in six tools. Patient and/or professional expert groups were involved in the development of five tools and only two tools were extensively validated or cross-culturally tested. Thirty-two experts (71%) completed the expert survey and identified 'intensity', 'temporal pattern', 'relief/exacerbation', 'pain quality' and 'location' as the five most relevant dimensions. Most preferred assessment of 'pain intensity' was by NRS rather than VRS. Time windows extending 24 h were regarded as less relevant. Development of PC pain assessment tools seems to be a continuous process, which does not adhere to systematic guidelines, thus does not contribute to a universally accepted tool. No tool contained all relevant dimensions as defined by the experts. Many tools focused on particular dimensions, suggesting that specific research interests may drive the tool development process. Extensive literature reviews, expert and patient input and clinical studies are a needed approach in the development of a new consensus-based pain assessment tool.

“We all talk about it as though we’re thinking about the same thing.” Healthcare professionals’ goals in the management of pain due to advanced cancer: a qualitative study

“…They felt patients found it difficult to describe their pain or use numerical rating scales despite guidance suggesting routine use [23]. This may be because such scales are designed primarily as research tools and patients are seldom involved in their development [24,25]. This corresponds with the findings of our recent qualitative study in patients with advanced cancer; patients found the use of numerical rating scales challenging and did not equate 'pain control' with being pain-free, or having a score at a certain level.…”

The Impact of a Novel Tool for Comprehensive Assessment of Palliative Care (MPCAT) on Assessment Outcome at 6- and 12-Month Follow-Up

“…26 For example the clinician is requested to enquire about pain intensity at the time of assessment and at its worst over the last twenty fours using a 0 -10 numerical rating scale. 27,28 An adapted version of the symptom assessment checklist described by Homsi et al, 2006 was utilised in that the symptoms were grouped according to the respiratory system, cardiovascular, central nervous systems and the upper, middle and lower gastrointestinal system to aid recall. 16 The…”

An improved digital pain body map

“…This may be due to several factors, of which lack of systematic assessment has been recognized in several studies. A review of pain assessment tools for self-reporting concluded that intensity, location, and time of occurrence are the most important aspects to include in a comprehensive assessment, as they may give the physician important clues for the pain diagnosis and treatment [10], [11].…”