Pain extent is more strongly associated with disability, psychological factors, and neck muscle function in people with non-traumatic versus traumatic chronic neck pain: a cross sectional study

Hansen, Inge Ris; Barbero, Marco; Falla, Deborah; Larsen, M. Holst; Kraft, M. Nielsen; Søgaard, Karen; Juul-Kristensen, Birgit

doi:10.23736/s1973-9087.18.04977-8

Cited by 30 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…From the thirteen studies that were examined, two were excluded, the first one because it included asymptomatic individuals [ 11 ], and the second one because it was a randomized controlled clinical trial [ 19 ]. A total of eleven cross-sectional cohort studies [ 10 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ] were included in the final literature data mapping ( Figure 3 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All studies used digital software-based computation for calculating pain extent with six of them collecting data with digitalized PDs on a tablet [ 10 , 20 , 21 , 24 , 27 , 28 ] and five using a pen-to-paper approach [ 22 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 29 ]. Across all studies, the pain extent ranged from 6.7% to 22% (mean ± SD: 12.1% ± 5.3%), and in all cases its computation was software-based as per the inclusion criteria.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical Significance and Diagnostic Value of Pain Extent Extracted from Pain Drawings: A Scoping Review

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current scoping review aimed to map current literature investigating the relationship between pain extent extracted from pain drawings with clinical, psychological, and psycho-physiological patient-reported outcome measures in people with pain. Electronic databases were searched for cross-sectional cohort studies that collected pain drawings using digital technology or a pen-on-paper approach and assessed for correlations between pain extent and clinical, psychological or psycho-physical outcomes. Data were extracted by two different reviewers. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Mapping of the results included: 1, description of included studies; 2, summary of results; and 3, identification of gaps in the existing literature. Eleven cross-sectional cohort studies were included. The pain disorders considered were heterogeneous, ranging from musculoskeletal to neuropathic conditions, and from localized to generalized pain conditions. All studies included pain and/or pain-related disability as clinical outcomes. Psychological outcomes included depression and anxiety, kinesiophobia and catastrophism. Psycho-physical measures included pressure or thermal pain thresholds. Ten studies were considered of high methodological quality. There was heterogeneity in the associations between pain extent and patient-reported outcome measures depending on the pain condition. This scoping review found that pain extent is associated with patient-reported outcome measures more so in patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain, e.g., neck pain or osteoarthritis, rather than for those with neuropathic pain or headache.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Significance and Diagnostic Value of Pain Extent Extracted from Pain Drawings: A Scoping Review

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Reis et al (2018) had studied brain regions related to emotions and cognition in patients with chronic pain and found that changes in brain function are related to CWP in various regions of the body. In particular, CWP was associated with high rates of anxiety and depression, but evidence is still scarce (Hagen et al, 2011;Ris et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between healthcare seeking and pain expansion in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain

Grande-Alonso

Muñoz-García

Cuenca‐Martínez

et al. 2020

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal problem, which implies a high rate of chronicity. The chronicity of symptoms can lead to pain expansion. The main objective of this study was to assess whether there were differences between patients with nonspecific chronic LBP (CLBP) who sought healthcare compared to those who did not in terms of pain expansion. Methods Ninety individuals participated in the study and were divided into three groups: 30 patients who sought care; 30 patients who did not seek care; and 30 asymptomatic individuals. The primary variable analyzed was pain expansion. Secondary physical and psychological variables were assessed later, and a regression analysis was performed. Results Patients who sought help showed significant differences in pain expansion and pain intensity compared with the group who did not seek help, with a medium effect size (0.50–0.79). The regression model for the care-seeking group showed that dynamic balance with the left leg and depression were predictors of percentage pain surface area (34.6%). The combination of dynamic balance, range of movement in flexoextension and depression were predictors of widespread pain (48.5%). Conclusion Patients who soughtcare presented greater pain expansion than patients whodidnot. A combination of functional and psychological variables can significantly predict pain expansion in patients with nonspecific CLBP who seek help.

show abstract

“…Lin et al noted that recent clinical guidelines universally recommend psychosocial assessment for musculoskeletal pain, with the exception of neck pain [36]. Psychological states have been shown to be significantly associated with the extent of opioid abuse [37,38]. However, recommendations based on psychological status assessment of neck pain treatment have been contradictory, showing that the effect of psychological status in neck pain patients is not well understood.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Real-World Evidence in Prescription Medication Use Among U.S. Adults with Neck Pain

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Neck pain is a common condition that leads to serious pain, disability, and increased healthcare costs worldwide. Pharmacotherapy is one of the most common strategies to reduce neck pain in patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the real-world pattern of drugs prescribed for patients with neck pain in the USA. Methods: Data on individuals who reported current neck pain in the 2009-2010 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and with a history of persistent pain for at least 6 weeks or 3 months were extracted from the NHANES database. Those included in the study were divided into three groups based on the duration of pain: the without neck pain group (Group A); subacute group (Group B) with a history of 6 weeks of neck pain; and the chronic neck pain group (Group C) with a history of 3 months of neck pain. The use and duration of medication Digital Features To view digital features for this article go to

show abstract

Pain extent is more strongly associated with disability, psychological factors, and neck muscle function in people with non-traumatic versus traumatic chronic neck pain: a cross sectional study

Cited by 30 publications

References 40 publications

Clinical Significance and Diagnostic Value of Pain Extent Extracted from Pain Drawings: A Scoping Review

Clinical Significance and Diagnostic Value of Pain Extent Extracted from Pain Drawings: A Scoping Review

Relationship between healthcare seeking and pain expansion in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain

Real-World Evidence in Prescription Medication Use Among U.S. Adults with Neck Pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About