1997
DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199703000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain in 4- to 6-Year-Old Children Receiving Intramuscular Injections: A Comparison of the Faces Pain Scale with Other Self-Report and Behavioral Measures

Abstract: The Faces Pain Scale was simple to use, readily understood by the children, and showed a realistic distribution of scores with respect to the type of pain being measured. With the exception of verbal reactions (which were not meaningfully related to self-report), observer ratings based on detailed coding of the child's behavior correlated only poorly to moderately well with self-report scores (r = .39 to r = .58). Similarly, although confident in their judgments, the nurses' ratings showed only moderate agreem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
2
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
64
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also used the Pain-O-Meter because even younger children who may not be able to cope with numerical symbols understand the concepts of more/less and higher/ lower and can apply them to facial representations. 1,8,9 The major finding of the study was the statistically significantly greater pain relief on both days 2 and 3 of treatment in the patients who were given ear drops alone than in the patients who were given ear drops and antibiotics. Nevertheless, all of the variables in our study model explained only 22% of the reduction in pain and suggested that the remaining relief may be accounted for by the passage of time alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We also used the Pain-O-Meter because even younger children who may not be able to cope with numerical symbols understand the concepts of more/less and higher/ lower and can apply them to facial representations. 1,8,9 The major finding of the study was the statistically significantly greater pain relief on both days 2 and 3 of treatment in the patients who were given ear drops alone than in the patients who were given ear drops and antibiotics. Nevertheless, all of the variables in our study model explained only 22% of the reduction in pain and suggested that the remaining relief may be accounted for by the passage of time alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The age of the children and the nature of the disorder make it difficult to measure the pain thresh- Table 1 Frequency distribution of pain reactivities determined from the structured interview with parents, by study group old. A communication disorder does not allow for checklist and self-reporting measures [13]. The abnormal reaction to body contact precludes using standardized situations, such as intramuscular injections or venipuncture for medical purposes [14], because an autistic child can have violent panic attacks just when touched.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abnormal reaction to body contact precludes using standardized situations, such as intramuscular injections or venipuncture for medical purposes [14], because an autistic child can have violent panic attacks just when touched. Furthermore, the faces pain scale [13,15] is useless because a child with autistic disorder typically shows poor modulation of the emotions with inappropriate body expressions. In spite of these methodological limitations, abnormal pain reactivity is an interesting feature because it may represent the clinical expression of neurochemical dysfunctions reported in autism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the caregivers could judge the pain facial expression more salient and consistent than cry [15]- [17]. The facial expression of pain is unique and different from the six basic emotions [14] which are widely accepted by psychologists.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%