2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain Screening in the Older Adult With Delirium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These facts could explain why nurses adapted the scale to the patient. Goebel et al., ( 2019 ) endorse the use of the PAINAD scale in patients with delirium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These facts could explain why nurses adapted the scale to the patient. Goebel et al., ( 2019 ) endorse the use of the PAINAD scale in patients with delirium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, progress has been made in managing pain for patients with dementia. Numerous studies have evaluated PAINAD scale in different care settings (Fry et al, 2017;Goebel et al, 2019), reviewed pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for pain (Schuler, 2019), and updated protocols and guidelines for pain management in older people with dementia (Herr et al, 2019;Schofield, 2018;Whitlock et al, 2017). However, there are few studies focussed on nursing records about pain and pain management, and most of these deal with oncological pain (Song et al, 2015) or postsurgical pain (Erden et al, 2017;Heikkilä et al, 2016).…”
Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individual domain items were scored from 0 (no pain) to 2 (highest score for pain); total scores range from 0 to 8. A score ≧2 indicates pain [ 8 10 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to their psychometric properties Goebel et al (2019) found PAINAD to be a reliable and valid tool for pain screening in medical or surgical settings. However, a recent systematic review (Tapp et al 2019) assessing pain assessment tools for non-verbal patients at EoL concluded that more work is needed to improve the scientific basis for testing and recommended a new tool be developed for this population.…”
Section: Table 4 Herementioning
confidence: 99%