2016
DOI: 10.5117/9789089647023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Painting and Publishing as Cultural Industries. The Fabric of Creativity in the Dutch Republic, 1580-1800

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It, too, shows in the first three decades of the 17th century, the painting production grew in an accelerating pace, before hit the wall around 1640, when the growth rate almost dropped to zero. This stagnation shows an early sign of saturation in the art market given the fact that the population of painters underwent a spectacular increase at the same time as Rasterhoff (2017) observed. Remarkably, the production managed to break through and embraced another stage of rapid growth, although at a slightly lower and diminishing rate, in the following two decades (the growth rate see Figure 1b).…”
Section: Production Trend Visualizedmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It, too, shows in the first three decades of the 17th century, the painting production grew in an accelerating pace, before hit the wall around 1640, when the growth rate almost dropped to zero. This stagnation shows an early sign of saturation in the art market given the fact that the population of painters underwent a spectacular increase at the same time as Rasterhoff (2017) observed. Remarkably, the production managed to break through and embraced another stage of rapid growth, although at a slightly lower and diminishing rate, in the following two decades (the growth rate see Figure 1b).…”
Section: Production Trend Visualizedmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Although it has been suggested that the Dutch art market reached its pinnacle around 1660 and collapsed after the 1660s (De Vries 1991;Bok 1994Bok , 2001, scholars have not yet been able to elucidate the exact trend and fluctuations of painting production in the Dutch Republic. Due to the lack of historical sources on the painting production, existing studies either extrapolate the available materials to fill the missing data (Van der Woude 1991;Montias 1990; De Marchi andMiegroet 2006, 2014), or use the number of painters in the Republic to indicate the size of the art market (Rasterhoff 2017;Nijboer 2010). Nonetheless, both approaches are subject to a wide margin of error and are yet to yield convincing results (Brosens and Stighelen 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the inventories after may have suffered from inflation from the secondhand paintings. The production trend in Figure 1 is almost perfectly correlated with the total number of painters in the ECARTICO database, a source used by Rasterhoff (2017) and (Figure 3), with a correlation coefficient of 0.99 at the 0.01 significance level. As the inventory-based sample and painter's population both indicate a similar trend as Figure 1, I am more confident that the RKD data should be able to accurately reflect the production trend of Dutch paintings in the 17th century.…”
Section: Production Trend Visualizedmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…With the substantial cost and risk topped with the fierce competition in the art market, the economic man with the perfect, logical, deductive rationality, as assumed in neoclassical economics, would hesitate to take on the painting profession after the 1610s. However, Rasterhoff (2017) observed that the proportion of newcomers to total active painters started to increase in the 1620s without apparent grounds for a surge in demand for paintings while the economy wavered after the war resumed in (Goldgar 2007). Previous historians explained it as a result of the expectation of future demand .…”
Section: Decisions Under Risk and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation