2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2016.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Painting factor H onto mesenchymal stem cells protects the cells from complement- and neutrophil-mediated damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…53 Similar conjugation schemes have been adopted for coating factor H proteins onto the surface of mesenchymal stem cells, thereby protecting them from complement attack. 54 Mimicking how bacteria evade the human immune system by hijacking regulatory proteins, Wu et al developed an alternative method to tether factor H-binding peptides covalently onto polystyrene surfaces, and when incubated in serum, factor H proteins became bound to this functionalized surface and significantly inhibited complement activation. 55,56 Based on the aforementioned studies, there is strong evidence supporting that factor H coatings are an excellent biomimetic strategy to reduce complement activation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 Similar conjugation schemes have been adopted for coating factor H proteins onto the surface of mesenchymal stem cells, thereby protecting them from complement attack. 54 Mimicking how bacteria evade the human immune system by hijacking regulatory proteins, Wu et al developed an alternative method to tether factor H-binding peptides covalently onto polystyrene surfaces, and when incubated in serum, factor H proteins became bound to this functionalized surface and significantly inhibited complement activation. 55,56 Based on the aforementioned studies, there is strong evidence supporting that factor H coatings are an excellent biomimetic strategy to reduce complement activation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important question of whether the anti-donor antibody response to allogeneic MSCs has the potential to cause immunological 'rejection' of the implanted MSCs (or of subsequent doses of allogeneic MSCs) remains unclear. Theoretically, this could occur directly through activation of the classical complement activation pathway, through complement-mediated activation of innate immune cells such as neutrophils, macrophages and natural killer cells or through concomitant anti-donor CD4 þ and CD8 þ T-cell responses 17,[37][38][39] . Our observation of equivalent efficacy of autologous and allogeneic MSCs in the hindlimb ischemic model suggests that anti-donor immunogenicity did not compromise the beneficial effect of a single injection of intramuscular B6 MSC in db/db recipients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lin et al . have reported that release of C5a following complement fixation by MSC results in activation of neutrophils and cell damage via the resulting oxidative burst . Furthermore, the complement cleavage product iC3b may serve as an activating ligand to enhance NK cell‐mediated lysis of MSC in vivo …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%