“…If there exist derivations d, g : R → R such that the mappingx → d 2 (x) + g(x), x m is n-anti-centralizing on R, then we have d = g = 0 on R.Proof. In view of the same process as in the proof of Theorem 2.3, the relation (2.6) yields that d 2 is a derivation on R. From[13], it follows that d = 0 on R and so the relation(2.6) gives g = 0 on R, i.e., d = g = 0 on R. Theorems 2.4 and 2.5 are to improve Corollaries 3.2 and 3.3 of[22], respectively. We continue the next result.Theorem 2.6.…”