1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.40.968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pair truncation for rotational nuclei: j=(17/2 model

Abstract: The suitability of the pair condensate approach for rotational states is studied in a single j =shell of identical nucleons interacting through a quadrupole-quadrupole Hamiltonian. The ground band and a K =2 excited band are both studied in detail. A direct comparison of the exact states with those constituting the SD and SDG subspaces is used to identify the important degrees of freedom for these levels. The range of pairs necessary for a good description is found to be highly state dependent; S and D pairs a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the SDPSM is also built up from SD pairs, it is expected that the SDPSM can produce similar results to those of the IBM. Our previous work show that the vibrational, rotational, and gamma-soft spectra can be well reproduced [49] similar to the U(5), SU (3) and SO (6) limiting spectra in the IBM. What's more, the vibrational-rotational phase transition for identical system can also be produced within the framework of the SDPSM with fermionic degrees of freedom [50].…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Since the SDPSM is also built up from SD pairs, it is expected that the SDPSM can produce similar results to those of the IBM. Our previous work show that the vibrational, rotational, and gamma-soft spectra can be well reproduced [49] similar to the U(5), SU (3) and SO (6) limiting spectra in the IBM. What's more, the vibrational-rotational phase transition for identical system can also be produced within the framework of the SDPSM with fermionic degrees of freedom [50].…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…(24) AtApt~0) -+ (b~b~~+z~b'tbJ)~0). mb A&t -+ b&~-2 ) tr (ApA&~A"At)b&tbt"b Ap, u T -+ 2tr ) (A TAp)bt bp cxP (20) The operators are then clearly finite; on the other hand they are just as clearly non-Hermitian. From a computational viewpoint non-Hermiticity is only a minor barrier, but it is an obstacle to an understanding of the microscopic origin of Hermitian IBM Hamiltonians.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Boson Mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take the simple mapping of fermion states into boson states I+~)~l~~) = 6, ' I0), (41) where the bt are boson creation operators. We construct boson operators that preserve matrix elements, introducing boson operators 7~, V~, and most importantly, the norm operator A'gy such that (4 I 7a I@p) = (@ I T I4'p), (46) where the colons ":" refer to normal-ordering of the boson operators, and CI, --2":trP": is the kth-order Casimir of SU (20), with P = P bt 6 A At (the trace is over the matrices and not the boson Fock space). This norm operator, which takes into account the exchange terms in the BZ expansion of a fermion pair given in (14), is found in Ref.…”
Section: Matrix Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Hamiltonian (with some adjustable parameters) has been approximated by the spherical single-particle energy term and terms of residual interactions consisting of the monopole, quadrupole pairing and quadrupole-quadrupole interaction between like valence nucleons and quadrupole-quadrupole interaction between valence protons and neutrons. The structure of the S pair was determined by solving the Bardeen-Cooper-Schriefer equation and the D pair is related to the S pair via a commutation with a quadrupole operator [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%