2023
DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pair-Variational Autoencoders for Linking and Cross-Reconstruction of Characterization Data from Complementary Structural Characterization Techniques

Abstract: In materials research, structural characterization often requires multiple complementary techniques to obtain a holistic morphological view of a synthesized material. Depending on the availability and accessibility of the different characterization techniques (e.g., scattering, microscopy, spectroscopy), each research facility or academic research lab may have access to high-throughput capability in one technique but face limitations (sample preparation, resolution, access time) with other technique(s). Furthe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 81 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the challenging aspects of using IR microscopy to study the spatial distribution of IR spectra of different samples aged under different environmental conditions is understanding the large amount of data that is generated. Instead of using a univariate analysis to focus on specific IR absorption bands to interpret these large amounts of data as has been done in previous studies, , machine learning approaches such as deep or generative learning have been used recently in the field of materials science to provide new insights into the analysis of large amounts of spectroscopy and microscopy data. Recently, we developed a deep learning β-variational autoencoder (β-VAE) model to analyze IR spectra of PEX-a pipe. , β-VAEs are a class of deep generative models that can learn disentangled (independent and interpretable) representations of the generative factors responsible for variance in data. We previously trained our β-VAE model on a diverse data set of 25,000 IR spectra of PEX-a pipe exposed to different environmental conditions . We learned three informative latent dimensions corresponding to three physicochemical processes responsible for the variance in the IR microscopy data: the most informative latent dimension, L1, which describes the hydrolysis of a stabilizing additive; the second latent dimension, L2, which describes the oxidative degradation of amorphous polyethylene; and the third latent dimension, L3, which describes crack-specific degradation characterized by ketone carbonyl and conjugated alkene formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the challenging aspects of using IR microscopy to study the spatial distribution of IR spectra of different samples aged under different environmental conditions is understanding the large amount of data that is generated. Instead of using a univariate analysis to focus on specific IR absorption bands to interpret these large amounts of data as has been done in previous studies, , machine learning approaches such as deep or generative learning have been used recently in the field of materials science to provide new insights into the analysis of large amounts of spectroscopy and microscopy data. Recently, we developed a deep learning β-variational autoencoder (β-VAE) model to analyze IR spectra of PEX-a pipe. , β-VAEs are a class of deep generative models that can learn disentangled (independent and interpretable) representations of the generative factors responsible for variance in data. We previously trained our β-VAE model on a diverse data set of 25,000 IR spectra of PEX-a pipe exposed to different environmental conditions . We learned three informative latent dimensions corresponding to three physicochemical processes responsible for the variance in the IR microscopy data: the most informative latent dimension, L1, which describes the hydrolysis of a stabilizing additive; the second latent dimension, L2, which describes the oxidative degradation of amorphous polyethylene; and the third latent dimension, L3, which describes crack-specific degradation characterized by ketone carbonyl and conjugated alkene formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%