2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10922-016-9364-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pair-Wise Collision-Based Underwater Time Synchronization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, collisions cannot be totally avoided. In addition, due to the lack of a delivery report in the case of broadcasting, collided packets cannot be identiied and recovered [14,15].…”
Section: Drawbacks Of Broadcasting In Ieee 80211 Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, collisions cannot be totally avoided. In addition, due to the lack of a delivery report in the case of broadcasting, collided packets cannot be identiied and recovered [14,15].…”
Section: Drawbacks Of Broadcasting In Ieee 80211 Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From (15) and for SIFS = 10 × 10 −6 s and DIFS = 50 × 10 −6 s, the one round timeframe is calculated to be 0.01,998 s. In the implementation of H-EBNA we adjust the value of T threshold in order for each STA to be given a "three rounds opportunity" to transmit a packet using the maximum round time value (Round 60 ). This gives consequently a T threshold-60 = 0.05995 s. Using the above described scheme, we actually give to all STAs in the network a probability of at least 300% to gain access to the medium and complete a packet broadcast.…”
Section: Deining the Active Stas In The Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%