2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10909-018-02117-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pairing of the Pöschl–Teller gas

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The essential difference compared with what we have discussed in previous work [35,129] is the operator form (6.1) of the interaction. Instead of a local W (r), we have the spin-dependent interactionW…”
Section: Energeticsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The essential difference compared with what we have discussed in previous work [35,129] is the operator form (6.1) of the interaction. Instead of a local W (r), we have the spin-dependent interactionW…”
Section: Energeticsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…125 to study pairing in the unitary limit. We have recently examined the ground state and pairing properties of the Pöschl-Teller gas [129]; in this work we have improved these calculations by applying the improvements outlined above. Since many techical details have been discussed in the preceding sections, we can restrict ourselves to display just the new aspects of our calculations.…”
Section: Pöschl-teller Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang and Sun [20] employed both terraced and sloped layouts for a 20 MW PV project site and found that the terraced layout had certain economic advantages over the sloped layout. Fan [21] used manual grid division and manual assignment to optimize the site leveling design of the same project. The results displayed significant improvements over the original design from FastTFT [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some optimization research in civil engineering and agriculture can provide valuable insights for designing the leveling of PV slopes. Currently, the most researched method is the plane method [22], which includes approaches based on least squares [16,21] and improved least square methods [23]. However, these methods tend to produce non-optimal results as they only provide a plane-fitting surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%