“…Cerebellar learning theories (Ito, 1970;Kawato, 1999;Yamamoto et al, 2002) state that PFs convey the information required for motor command generation, whereas CFs carry error signals, which are inevitably delayed compared with PF activation. Thus, the theories predict that PF activation preceding CF activation is a more effective sequence to induce LTD than CF activation preceding PF activation, and this has been supported by several experimental studies (Chen and Thompson, 1995;Schreurs et al, 1996;Wang et al, 2000). However, inconsistent PF-CF time windows for LTD induction have frequently been reported, and it has been found possible to induce LTD in vitro by massive stimulation of a PF bundle alone (Hartell, 1996), Ca 2ϩ uncaging (Miyata et al, 2000), or inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP 3 ) uncaging (Finch and Augustine, 1998) instead of by conjunctive PF-CF stimulation, thus raising doubts about LTD as one of the cellular bases of learning (De Schutter, 1995;Llinas et al, 1997).…”