2019
DOI: 10.1785/0220180326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pairwise Association of Seismic Arrivals with Convolutional Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning (ML) analysis of seismic data is an expanding field, with recent studies focusing on event detection 21 , phase identification 22 , phase association 23,24 , or patterns in seismicity 25 . In the following, we investigate whether seismic signatures can be found in the period leading up to any known manifestation of major slow slip occurrence anywhere in the Cascadia region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) analysis of seismic data is an expanding field, with recent studies focusing on event detection 21 , phase identification 22 , phase association 23,24 , or patterns in seismicity 25 . In the following, we investigate whether seismic signatures can be found in the period leading up to any known manifestation of major slow slip occurrence anywhere in the Cascadia region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other places in which the method can be improved are in adaptively adjusting the RBF-kernel widths to account for known variability in travel time uncertainties (between different stations and candidate source regions), and also in incorporating additional information into the graphs prior to applying competitive assignment. For example, edge weights could be weighted by the predicted phase-likelihood of each arrival , and if pairs of arrivals are known with high certainty to come from a common source (Bergen and Beroza, 2018;McBrearty et al, 2019), a constraint could be added into the constraint matrix of (6) to force these arrivals to be assigned to a common source. An avenue of development, more generally, may be in constructing arrival-arrival indexed graphs (with edge weights proportional to the likelihood those arrivals are associated) which may contain additional, or complimentary information to be used with the current approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key Points: • Statistical features derived from time-windowed, filter-banked seismic data can be an effective way to characterize eruptive behavior of volcanoes • Supervised learning allows us to determine the eruptive state of the volcano given a single time window of raw seismic data from a single station • Spectral clustering can reveal different phases of eruptions and differences between various eruptions name a few (McBrearty et al, 2019;Ross et al, 2019). With regard to the applications of ML to study and characterization of volcanoes, the primary applications thus far have been in the classification of volcanoseismic signals (Hibert et al, 2017;Malfante et al, 2018;Titos et al, 2019).…”
Section: 1029/2019gl085523mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of machine learning (ML) techniques to the analysis of geophysical signals has become widespread in diverse settings such as the analysis of laboratory experiments (Hulbert et al, ; Rouet‐Leduc et al, ; Rouet‐Leduc, Hulbert, Bolton, et al, ), tracking slow‐slip in real Earth (Rouet‐Leduc, Hulbert, & Johnson, ), and phase association for the development of earthquake catalogs to name a few (McBrearty et al, ; Ross et al, ). With regard to the applications of ML to study and characterization of volcanoes, the primary applications thus far have been in the classification of volcano‐seismic signals (Hibert et al, ; Malfante et al, ; Titos et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%