2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2961391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pairwise Matching for 3D Fragment Reassembly Based on Boundary Curves and Concave-Convex Patches

Abstract: We present a simple pairwise matching method for 3D fragment reassembly that uses boundary curves and concave-convex patches to accelerate and optimize the matching. Given the boundary curves of two fracture surfaces that completely or partially coincide, we can quickly exclude the fracture surface pairs with low boundary curve similarities, which can substantially reduce the computational cost of the subsequent patch matching, where we extract and delineate concave-convex patches of the selected fracture surf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They extract clusters of multiscale integral invariant features for each fracture surface and use a forward search algorithm to identify patches of similar features for pairwise matching. (Li et al, 2020) is one of the recent extended methods of Huang et al's approach. They present a simple well-evaluated method for pairwise matching and alignment of 3D fragments.…”
Section: Pairwise Alignment In Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They extract clusters of multiscale integral invariant features for each fracture surface and use a forward search algorithm to identify patches of similar features for pairwise matching. (Li et al, 2020) is one of the recent extended methods of Huang et al's approach. They present a simple well-evaluated method for pairwise matching and alignment of 3D fragments.…”
Section: Pairwise Alignment In Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupled with WMEs for penetration and gap, this provides the archaeologist with visual and quantitative measures that could help him/her better evaluate Fig. 15 Pairwise alignment through the concave-convex patches characterization in the CCP method of Li et al (Li et al, 2020) the quality of the fit from a broader archaeological perspective.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Archaeological Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fracture surface is selected as the data source because of its more extensive area, richer information, and continuous shape. This work follows Li′s approach [11] to accomplish region segmentation to strip fracture surfaces from the entire fragment. Additionally, random sampling is implemented to prepare normalized data as input to the following network.…”
Section: Data Preprocessing and Fracture Surfaces Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some researchers have fused multiple features to enhance the robustness of the algorithm. Li et al [11] used boundary curves of two fracture surfaces to determine preliminary matching and concave-convex patches to refine the alignment, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, potential matching relationships are computed by comparing the initial template to the geometrical information of the fractured pieces. More recently, Qunhui Li et al [14] presented a pairwise matching approach that compares concave-convex patches extracted along boundary contour surfaces. Afterwards, similar to the aforementioned approaches, the matched areas are accurately aligned by means of the Iterative Closest Points algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%