2016
DOI: 10.16943/ptinsa/2016/48468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palaeobiology of Indian Proterozoic and Early Cambrian Successions— Recent Developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acritarch-bearing Changzhougou Formation in China was previously dated at 1.80 Ga, which would make it older than the Ruyang Group, but was later dated to ~ 1.67-1.64 Ga (e.g., Lamb et al 2009;Peng et al 2009;Miao et al 2019). This age range is fairly similar to that of other notable acritarch records such as the ~ 1.65 Ga old Mallapunyah Formation in Australia (Javaux 2007) and the ≤ 1.63 Ga old Vindhyan Supergroup in India (Ray et al 2002;Prasad et al 2005;Singh and Sharma 2014;Sharma et al 2016). A further important microfossil record of early eukaryote diversity is the ~ 1.50 Ga old Roper Group in Australia (Javaux et al 2001;Javaux and Knoll 2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The acritarch-bearing Changzhougou Formation in China was previously dated at 1.80 Ga, which would make it older than the Ruyang Group, but was later dated to ~ 1.67-1.64 Ga (e.g., Lamb et al 2009;Peng et al 2009;Miao et al 2019). This age range is fairly similar to that of other notable acritarch records such as the ~ 1.65 Ga old Mallapunyah Formation in Australia (Javaux 2007) and the ≤ 1.63 Ga old Vindhyan Supergroup in India (Ray et al 2002;Prasad et al 2005;Singh and Sharma 2014;Sharma et al 2016). A further important microfossil record of early eukaryote diversity is the ~ 1.50 Ga old Roper Group in Australia (Javaux et al 2001;Javaux and Knoll 2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The Kurnool Group may be reaffirmed as distinctly Neoproterozoic in age, with zircons dated at 913 ± 11 Ma occurring in the Paniam Quartzite. To a large extent, this is consistent with the biotic remains reported from the Kurnool Group (Sharma et al, 2016;Sharma and Singh, 2019).…”
Section: Age Of Sequencessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Several carbonaceous organic remains and cyanobacteria have been reported from this horizon (Sharma et al, 2016;Sharma and Singh, 2019). Of these, Chuaria and Obruchevella have been considered to be diagnostic of upper Neoproterozoic age and suggest the correlation of the Kurnool Group with the comparable biota from the Bhima, Vindhyan and Chattisgarh basins.…”
Section: Owk Shalementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Remarks: The ribbon-like carbonaceous fossil Tyrasotaenia was initially recorded from the fine-grained clastic sediments of the 900 Ma Russian Platform (Gnilovskaya, 1971) and later from the 1,300 Ma Belt Supergroup, Montana (Walter et al, 1976); Little Dal Group, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwestern Canada (Hofmann and Aitken, 1979). In India, such types of carbonaceous filaments are known from the Proterozoic Vindhyan Supergroup (Shukla and Sharma, 1990;Sharma, 2006;Sharma et al, 2016). Based on its morphological similarity to stalks of Chorda and Scytosiphon belonging to the Phaeophyta, Tyrasotaenia podolica may be a remnant of benthic macroalga/seaweeds.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%