2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palaeolithic ceramic technology: The artistic origins and impacts of a technological innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Computational imaging, 3D scanning technologies and non-destructive analytical methods have also been applied to figurine assemblages from different spatial and temporal contexts to create 3D models for research and teaching (Morris et al 2018), examine manufacturing and production processes (Applbaum & Applbaum 2002; Delvaux et al 2017; Farbstein & Davies 2017; Kreiter et al 2014; Pavel et al 2013), explore figurines (and carved stone balls) as artefacts-in-process (Jones & Díaz-Guardamino 2019), analyse their chemical composition (Forouzan et al 2012; Kantarelou et al 2015), as well as experiment with computational algorithms that would enable fragment matching (Kaimaris et al 2011), hypothetical reconstructions (Papantoniou et al 2012) and the identification, extraction and classification of surface characteristics (Counts et al 2016; Vassallo 2016). In most cases, digital research has focused on 3D documentation and technological features of figurine making, with little or no discussion about the potential of the methods to enhance the sensory dimension of the artefacts in comparison to conventional modes of representation.…”
Section: Figurine Studies and Sensorialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational imaging, 3D scanning technologies and non-destructive analytical methods have also been applied to figurine assemblages from different spatial and temporal contexts to create 3D models for research and teaching (Morris et al 2018), examine manufacturing and production processes (Applbaum & Applbaum 2002; Delvaux et al 2017; Farbstein & Davies 2017; Kreiter et al 2014; Pavel et al 2013), explore figurines (and carved stone balls) as artefacts-in-process (Jones & Díaz-Guardamino 2019), analyse their chemical composition (Forouzan et al 2012; Kantarelou et al 2015), as well as experiment with computational algorithms that would enable fragment matching (Kaimaris et al 2011), hypothetical reconstructions (Papantoniou et al 2012) and the identification, extraction and classification of surface characteristics (Counts et al 2016; Vassallo 2016). In most cases, digital research has focused on 3D documentation and technological features of figurine making, with little or no discussion about the potential of the methods to enhance the sensory dimension of the artefacts in comparison to conventional modes of representation.…”
Section: Figurine Studies and Sensorialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversifikasi desain produk keramik dengan mempertimbangkan aspek prinsip-prinsip desain produk, diantaranya meliputi: keunikan dalam tampilan bentuk, nilai lokal, tingkat kerumitan, keharmonisan ornamen maupun bentuk, tingkat kerumitan pengerjaan, aspek kontras dalam keselarasan, keseimbangan komposisi desain secara keseluruhan, serta fungsional dan praktis (Farbstein & Davies, 2016).…”
Section: Pengujian Hasil Diversivikasiunclassified
“…Two additional aspects of Pavlovian owl representations are important to consider: (i) we are dealing with generic and rather abstract visualisations which we may address as generalised owls; (ii) owl representations transgress the boundaries of both broader raw material groups and 'art' categories; some pieces belong to what Svoboda and Frouz (2011, 200) have classified as 'mobile art', while others, in particular the clay figurines, represent 'static art' and were likely produced and buried in situ at the sites where they were excavated (Verpoorte 2001;Farbstein 2011;Farbstein and Davies 2017).…”
Section: The Owl As a Pavlovian Themementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sites have not only yielded relatively rich and diverse material culture repertoires (e.g. Klíma 1979;Svoboda 1991;Oliva 2007Oliva , 2015Hromodová 2016), including evidence for fibre technology with basket production (Adovasio, Soffer, and Klíma 1996;Soffer et al 1998;Svoboda et al 2009) and one of the world's oldest 'ceramic' traditions (Vandiver et al 1989;Farbstein 2011;Králík 2011;Svoboda 2012;Svoboda et al 2015;Farbstein and Davies 2017), but also indicate that Pavlovian people stayed unusually long at these sites and/or revisited them repeatedly on a yearround basis (Svoboda 2012;Svoboda et al 2015).…”
Section: Pavlovian Settlement Organisationmentioning
confidence: 99%