2020
DOI: 10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palaeoproterozoic Mafic magmatism in the Indian Shield: Petrologic, Geochemical and Thermal constraints on Proterozoic Mantle

Abstract: https: //doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020012 melts of deep mantle origin. We suggest that the major segments of the Indian SCLM were generated at around 3 Ga coinciding with a major crustal building activity in the Indian shield.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only limited data are available for the mafic dyke swarms in the Western Dharwar Craton. Previous researchers recognized three main dyke swarms in the WDC, concentrated towards the southern part of the craton (Murthy et al, 1987;Radhakrishna and Joseph, 1993;Meert and Pandit, 2015). However, recent studies on the mafic dyke swarms of WDC reported dykes that are exclusive to the Western Dharwar Craton along with younger generations of dykes that are geochemically coherent to the ~2.37 Ga dykes of the EDC (Silpa and Satish-Kumar, 2018;Rai et al, 2019;Yadav et al, 2020;Silpa et al, 2021;Silpa et al, 2021;Pandey and Paul., 2022).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Only limited data are available for the mafic dyke swarms in the Western Dharwar Craton. Previous researchers recognized three main dyke swarms in the WDC, concentrated towards the southern part of the craton (Murthy et al, 1987;Radhakrishna and Joseph, 1993;Meert and Pandit, 2015). However, recent studies on the mafic dyke swarms of WDC reported dykes that are exclusive to the Western Dharwar Craton along with younger generations of dykes that are geochemically coherent to the ~2.37 Ga dykes of the EDC (Silpa and Satish-Kumar, 2018;Rai et al, 2019;Yadav et al, 2020;Silpa et al, 2021;Silpa et al, 2021;Pandey and Paul., 2022).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%