Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on 3D Body Scanning Technologies, Lugano, Switzerland, 27-28 October 2015 2015
DOI: 10.15221/15.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palatal Volume Changes in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Paediatric Patients

Abstract: Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) are the most common craniofacial abnormalities. CL/P therapy involves also orthopedic and surgical treatments. In particular, the orthopedic treatment can help to align the cleft segments and facilitate surgery. Traditionally, facial and palatal structures have been analyzed by 2D methods, omitting information of volume bone defects. A pre-surgical volume estimation can be useful to determine the anatomical boundaries of the alveolar bone defect; subsequently, volume assessments … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The following linear measurements were analysed: C–C′ (Intercanine distance)—transversal line between the eruption points of the primary canine; T–T′ (Intertuberosity distance)—transversal line between the left and right tuberosity; I–C′ (Left anterior intersegment length)—from the interincisive point to the eruption point of the left primary canine; I–C (Right anterior intersegment length)—from the interincisive point to the eruption point of the right primary canine; I–T′ (Left anteroposterior intersegment length)—from the interincisive point to the left tuberosity; I–T (Right anteroposterior intersegment length) from the interincisive point to the right tuberosity 1‐5,16,17 . The volume of the palatal bone shelves was analysed according to the methodology of the study of Pucciarelli et al, 2015, 18 whereas the area of the palatal bone shelves was evaluated according to Carrara et al, 2016 1 and Ambrosio et al, 2018 2 (Figure 1). One trained and calibrated examiner performed all morphometric analyses 1‐3,5,16,17 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following linear measurements were analysed: C–C′ (Intercanine distance)—transversal line between the eruption points of the primary canine; T–T′ (Intertuberosity distance)—transversal line between the left and right tuberosity; I–C′ (Left anterior intersegment length)—from the interincisive point to the eruption point of the left primary canine; I–C (Right anterior intersegment length)—from the interincisive point to the eruption point of the right primary canine; I–T′ (Left anteroposterior intersegment length)—from the interincisive point to the left tuberosity; I–T (Right anteroposterior intersegment length) from the interincisive point to the right tuberosity 1‐5,16,17 . The volume of the palatal bone shelves was analysed according to the methodology of the study of Pucciarelli et al, 2015, 18 whereas the area of the palatal bone shelves was evaluated according to Carrara et al, 2016 1 and Ambrosio et al, 2018 2 (Figure 1). One trained and calibrated examiner performed all morphometric analyses 1‐3,5,16,17 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images of the dental arches at T2 were superimposed to those at T1, of the same participant. Firstly, the palatal bone shelves were delimited—alveolar bone ridge and maxilla 18,19 . Then, the software calculated the point‐by‐point distance, expressed by Root Mean Square (RMS) in mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 ] The virtual analysis of the dental arch morphology from birth to skeletal maturity is easy, favors the diagnosis, and enables to tailor the therapeutic planning during the anatomic-functional rehabilitation. [ 13 ] Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the dimensional alterations of the dental arches of neonates with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate before and after two different primary surgery techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hand may be given from modern 3D image acquisition systems which have enabled researchers to improve the morphological and metrical assessment [11]: some examples are the measurements of surfaces and volumes of the palate in growing subjects [12]. In the field of congenital pathological abnormalities, the 3D approach was used to explore the metrical modifications of cleft palate [13][14][15]. Other applications in orthodontics concern the assessment of palatal linear modifications after maxillary expansion therapy [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%