Palatalisatsioonist ja prepalatalisatsioonist spontaanses eesti keeles

Pajusalu, Karl; Teras, Pire

doi:10.54013/kk677a1

Cited by 2 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Numerous studies have shown that the articulatory gesture of raising the tongue towards the hard palate causes a longer duration of the vowels that precede palatalized consonants (e.g., Cavar 2004, Kavitskaya 2006, Teras & Pajusalu 2014, Malmi & Lippus 2019. In Estonian, we have not found a lengthening effect on the palatalized consonant (Malmi & Lippus 2019, Malmi, Lippus & Meister 2022.…”

Section: Temporal Properties Of Russian L1 Speakers Compared To Eston...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is a coarticulatory process in which the place of articulation of a consonant is modified by a high vowel or a palatal glide /j/ that fol lows it (Kochetov 2011). Palatalization in Estonian (Teras & Pajusalu 2014) and Russian (Avanesov 1972) can be categorized as secondary palatalization. This means that consonants acquire a secondary palatal place of articulation while the primary place of articulation remains.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Articulatory research for Estonian (Kutser 1935, Ariste 1943, Eek 1971, Meister & Werner 2015 and Russian (Kochetov 2002), and acous tic research for both Estonian (Lehiste 1965, Teras & Pajusalu 2014, Malmi, Lippus & Meister 2022 and Russian (Avanesov 1972, Bolla 1981, Kochetov 2002, Kochetov 2017 have shown that the conso nant is palatalized by fronting and raising the tongue dorsum towards the hard palate while the primary constriction remains. The tongue has also been shown to be wider in Estonian (Kutser 1935, Ariste 1943, Eek 1971, Meister & Werner 2015.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We failed to find that palatalization had any effect on the duration of the consonants in our articulatory study (Malmi & Lippus 2019) and our acoustic study (Malmi, Lippus & Meister 2022) of Estonian palatalization. On the other hand, the vowels that precede palatalized consonants have been shown to be longer (Lehiste 1965, Liiv 1965, Bolla 1981, Zsiga 2000, Cavar 2004, Kavitskaya 2006, Kochetov 2006, Ordin 2010, Teras & Pajusalu 2014, Stoll, Harrington & Hoole 2015, Malmi & Lippus 2019, Malmi, Lippus & Meister 2022.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Articulatory properties of Estonian palatalization by Russian L1 speakers

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We studied the articulatory and temporal properties of Estonian palatalization by Russian L1 Estonian L2 speakers and compared the results to Estonian native speakers. The tongue movement of 24 Russian L1 and 21 Estonian L1 speakers were recorded with an electromagnetic articulograph. The speakers articulated phonologically contrastive word pairs and i-stemmed nouns where the final consonant was palatalized. Previous research has shown that palatalization is generally realized by raising the tongue dorsum towards the hard palate. Consequently, the tongue becomes more anterior and wider. This rising of the tongue also lengthens the duration of the segments. The results showed that Russian L1 speakers’ tongue dorsum was higher and more anterior when palatalizing consonants and the subsequent vowels. Compared to native speakers, their tongue was retracted and lower. Russian L1 speakers’ duration of palatalized consonants and the vowels that preceded them were significantly shorter than in the control group. They did not use duration to differentiate palatalization in word pairs as native speakers do. Kokkuvõte. Anton Malmi, Pärtel Lippus, Einar Meister: Vene emakeelega kõnelejate Eesti palatalisatsiooni artikulatoorsed ja temporaalsed tunnused. Artiklis uuritakse, kuidas vene emakeelega kõnelejad hääldavad eesti keele palatalisatsiooni. Varasemad uurimused on näidanud, et konsonanti palataliseeritakse keeleselja tõstmisega kõva suulae poole. Sellega kaasneb ka eespoolsem keele asend ja laiem keele jaotus suulaes ning hääliku pikem kestus. Uurimismaterjal koosnes sõnadest, kus palatalisatsioon eristas tähendust ja i-tüvelistest nimisõnadest, mis lõppesid pika palataliseeritud konsonandiga. Testsõnu sisaldavaid lauseid salvestasime elektromagnetartikulograafiga. Katses osales 24 vene emakeelega ja 21 eesti emakeelega kõnelejat. Tulemused näitasid, et vene emakeelega kõnelejate keel oli palataliseerimisele omaselt kõrgemal ja eespoolsem. Eestlastega võrreldes oli nende keel aga madalamal ja tagapoolsem. Vene emakeelega kõnelejad ei kasutanud palatalisatsioonipaarides kestust eristava tunnusena nagu emakeelsed kõnelejad seda teevad. Nende vokaalid ja konsonandid olid palatalsatsioonipaarides ja i-tüvelistes nimisõnades lühemad kui emakeelsetel kõnelejatel.

show abstract

Section: Temporal Properties Of Russian L1 Speakers Compared To Eston...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Articulatory properties of Estonian palatalization by Russian L1 speakers

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous research on palatalization has focused on describing palatalization through the properties of the transition from the preceding vowel to the consonant, often measuring the quality from a single or a few timepoints (Lehiste 1965, Liiv 1965a, b, Vihman 1967, Derkach et al 1970, Purcell 1979, Howie 2001, Kochetov 2002, Ćavar 2004, Kim 2012, Ní Chiosáin & Padgett 2012, Teras & Pajusalu 2014, Põld 2016, Piits & Kalvik 2019. We wanted to get a more dynamic view of the movements of the formants and to objectively quantify the time point where the formant values in non-palatalized and palatalized consonants and the vowels preceding them were significantly different.…”

Section: The Quality Of the Vowels Preceding Consonantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spectral and temporal properties of Estonian palatalization

Malmi

Lippus

Meister

2022

Journal of the International Phonetic Association

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to describe and compare the spectral and temporal properties of Estonian palatalized and non-palatalized consonants /l n s t/ and the vowels that precede them. Acoustic recordings of 43 native Estonian subjects producing word pairs where palatalization differentiated meaning were analyzed in this study. We offer a new perspective on how palatalization is realized by employing a dynamic analysis of the formant trajectories in order to objectively quantify how far the scope of palatalization reaches in the preceding vowel. Results showed that, as in other languages, the most persisting correlate of Estonian palatalization is the rise in F2 in the preceding vowel, where the values are almost always higher already from the beginning. F2 values are higher for /l/ and lower for /n/. The COG (center of gravity) of /s/ is lower in the beginning but rises in the middle. The COG of the burst of /t/ is lower in the onset. As expected, the duration of the vowels preceding consonants is longer, presumably because of the palatalization gesture, but the duration of the consonants does not show a systematic pattern with palatalization.

show abstract

Palatalisatsioonist ja prepalatalisatsioonist spontaanses eesti keeles

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Articulatory properties of Estonian palatalization by Russian L1 speakers

Articulatory properties of Estonian palatalization by Russian L1 speakers

Spectral and temporal properties of Estonian palatalization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About