2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1359-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: PALOMA-3 subgroup analysis of Japanese patients

Abstract: Background In the double-blind, phase 3 PALOMA-3 study, palbociclib–fulvestrant significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus placebo–fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) whose disease had progressed on prior endocrine therapy. The present study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of palbociclib plus fulvestrant in Japanese patients enrolled in PALOMA-3. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
43
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The palbociclib-fulvestrant group had significantly better ORR and CBR compared to the fulvestrant group. In the palbociclib-fulvestrant group of the PALOMA-3 trial, the ORRs were 21% in the overall population and 18.5% in the Japanese subgroup, and the CBRs were 66.3% in the overall population and 74.1% in the Japanese subgroup (18). The CBR in this study was like the trial, but the current study had a better ORR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The palbociclib-fulvestrant group had significantly better ORR and CBR compared to the fulvestrant group. In the palbociclib-fulvestrant group of the PALOMA-3 trial, the ORRs were 21% in the overall population and 18.5% in the Japanese subgroup, and the CBRs were 66.3% in the overall population and 74.1% in the Japanese subgroup (18). The CBR in this study was like the trial, but the current study had a better ORR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…However, there were fewer patients with visceral metastasis than in the PALOMA-3 trial (48% and 63%, respectively). Our result indicated better clinical response with palbociclib-fulvestrant than fulvestrant for Japanese patients with ER+HER2-MBC (18). We observed higher CBRs: i) in patients aged <70 years, ii) with BMI ≥25, iii) PgR positivity, iv) stage I-III at initial diagnosis, v) DFI 24 months or longer, vi) ≤1 previous line of endocrine therapy, vii) ≤1 previous line of chemotherapy, viii) no sensitivity to prior endocrine therapy, ix) two or more metastatic sites, and x) visceral metastasis in the palbociclib-fulvestrant group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Palbociclib (125 mg, 28-day cycle with aromatase inhibitor) is used as the targeted therapy against ER + /HER2 − advanced and metastatic breast cancer in conjunction with hormone therapy. The open label PALOMA (Palbociclib: Ongoing Trials in the Management of Breast Cancer) clinical trials were designed recently with either aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) (PALOMA-1 or PALOMA-2 Trials) [111,112] or Fulvestrant hormone therapies (PALOMA-3 trails) [113]. An improvement in the overall survival of metastatic breast cancer patients was reported in PALOMA-3 phase III clinical trials.…”
Section: Cdk4/6 Inhibitormentioning
confidence: 99%