2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2015.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleo-Asian oceanic subduction-related modification of the lithospheric mantle under the North China Craton: Evidence from peridotite xenoliths in the Datong basalts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between these two types of mantle metasomatism lies in two aspects: one is that the metasomatic mantle domain caused by recycling of Paleoproterozoic carbonates should be distributed in the north-south direction, while the metasomatic mantle domain caused by the southward subduction of the PAO plate should be distributed in the east-west direction; the other is that the re-cycled Paleoproterozoic carbonates and thus the metasomatized mantle is characterized by a relatively low 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio (Veizer and Mackenzie, 2003;Castillo, 2015). Recent studies have shown that the high 87 Sr/ 86 Sr mantle caused by carbonate metasomatism is along the east-west trending in the northern margin of the NCC (Xu et al, 2003;Zhang H F et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2017), while it is featured by north-south zoning in the interior of the NCC . This indicates that the metasomatic carbonate melts were mostly derived from recycled sedimentary carbonates related to the subduction of the PAO plate (Wang et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Influence Of Carbonate Recycling On the Crustmantle Compositions In The Northern Nccmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The difference between these two types of mantle metasomatism lies in two aspects: one is that the metasomatic mantle domain caused by recycling of Paleoproterozoic carbonates should be distributed in the north-south direction, while the metasomatic mantle domain caused by the southward subduction of the PAO plate should be distributed in the east-west direction; the other is that the re-cycled Paleoproterozoic carbonates and thus the metasomatized mantle is characterized by a relatively low 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio (Veizer and Mackenzie, 2003;Castillo, 2015). Recent studies have shown that the high 87 Sr/ 86 Sr mantle caused by carbonate metasomatism is along the east-west trending in the northern margin of the NCC (Xu et al, 2003;Zhang H F et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2017), while it is featured by north-south zoning in the interior of the NCC . This indicates that the metasomatic carbonate melts were mostly derived from recycled sedimentary carbonates related to the subduction of the PAO plate (Wang et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Influence Of Carbonate Recycling On the Crustmantle Compositions In The Northern Nccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of a large number of late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic granitoid intrusions in the northern margin of the NCC indicates that the subduction of the PAO slab could have strongly influenced the lithosphere of the NCC (Zhang et al, 2009a(Zhang et al, , 2009b. Therefore, although lithospheric thinning mainly occurred in the eastern part of the NCC and is considered to have been triggered by the subduction of the Pacific plate (Zhu et al, 2011), the subduction of the PAO slab transported abundant marine and continental sediments into the lithospheric mantle and undoubtedly contributed to the lithospheric mantle transformation of the NCC (Xu, 2002;Liu et al, 2010b;Chen et al, 2016Wang et al, 2016Wang et al, , 2019Wu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Geological Background and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations