2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleomagnetic study of ferromanganese crusts recovered from the northwest Pacific — Testing the applicability of the magnetostratigraphic method to estimate growth rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundaries between major polarity chrons (i.e., Brunhes normal, Matuyama reversed, Gauss normal, and Gilbert reversed chrons) were primarily used for the correlations (thick dotted lines in Figure ). We were able to assign age control points with higher resolutions than those obtained using sliced samples or the 10 Be/ 9 Be method [ Noguchi et al ., ]. For Chron C2 (1.778 – 2.581 Ma), although the longer “normal” interval of ~16 – 18 mm was correlated to Chron C2n (1.778 – 1.945 Ma) while the shorter “reversed” interval of ~15 – 16 mm was correlated to Chron C2r (1.945 – 2.581 Ma), this may be caused either by contamination of the normal magnetic field originating from strongly magnetized grains with positive magnetic anomalies, positive shift of the baseline, or slower growth rate during the reversed Chron C2r.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The boundaries between major polarity chrons (i.e., Brunhes normal, Matuyama reversed, Gauss normal, and Gilbert reversed chrons) were primarily used for the correlations (thick dotted lines in Figure ). We were able to assign age control points with higher resolutions than those obtained using sliced samples or the 10 Be/ 9 Be method [ Noguchi et al ., ]. For Chron C2 (1.778 – 2.581 Ma), although the longer “normal” interval of ~16 – 18 mm was correlated to Chron C2n (1.778 – 1.945 Ma) while the shorter “reversed” interval of ~15 – 16 mm was correlated to Chron C2r (1.945 – 2.581 Ma), this may be caused either by contamination of the normal magnetic field originating from strongly magnetized grains with positive magnetic anomalies, positive shift of the baseline, or slower growth rate during the reversed Chron C2r.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We processed the raw image from each magnetic scan by applying linear drift correction and median filtering (3 × 3 points) (see Figure S3 for details). Rock magnetic properties were measured using samples taken from three sliced samples (depth intervals of 0–1.4, 2.7–3.3, and 27.9–28.3 mm) collected from the Takuyo‐Daigo Seamount, which were used in the previous study by Noguchi et al []. Samples were placed in a 3.0 T magnetic field at 300 K to put saturation isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM), cooled down to 5 K, and warmed up to 300 K while measuring magnetizations with Magnetic Property Measurement System (MPMS, Quantum Design) at the Center for Advanced Marine Core Research, Kochi University, Japan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations