Paleomagnetism, Paleoclimates and the Problem of Extensive Horizontal Movements of the Earth's Crust

Kropotkin, P. N.

doi:10.1080/00206816209473756

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(1) Recent lists of paleomagnetic data for the U.S.S.R. have been published in the following articles: Kramov & Shmalevo (1963), Kropotkin (1961) Kalashnikov (1961). These paleomagnetic data agree with the paleo-climatic data and show that the Siberian and Russian tectonic platforms approached each other during the Paleozoic by some 3000 km.…”

Section: F a Vening Meinesz Formemrs Writesmentioning

confidence: 99%

XXV. Discussion

1965

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I have been asked to make a written contribution to the discussion, but have nothing new to say. My views will be found in the 1961 version of The Earth and in my lecture to the Royal Astronomical Society last October, which will be published in their Quarterly Journal. My main points are that the only type of imperfection of elasticity considered in convection and drift theories is the elastico-viscous law, which has been found to lead to numerous contradictions when confronted with actual evidence. Different phenomena led to values of the effective viscosity differing by factors of millions. On the other hand, a modified law, chosen to fit two quantitative data and applied far beyond the range of periods related to those data, has steered its way nicely among the other evidence for some sort of imperfection of elasticity, without giving any contradiction. But it does forbid convection and continental drift. I should be disposed to agree that inability to explain an alleged phenomenon is not necessarily a disproof of that phenomenon; but it does require a higher standard of scrutiny of the evidence for that phenomenon. The standard actually applied to evidence for continental drift seems to be considerably lower than is usual for a new phenomenon, and is not associated with any alternative explanations of things that can be explained.

show abstract

Section: F a Vening Meinesz Formemrs Writesmentioning

confidence: 99%