2010
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.81.6.1032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleoseismic Sand Blows in North Louisiana and South Arkansas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geologic map of study area showing previously reported sand blow sites (Cox et al, 2004(Cox et al, , 2007(Cox et al, , 2010 and the 25 labeled field sites in this study ( Table 1). A "Site O" designation was intentionally not used to avoid confusion with Holocene liquefaction sites.…”
Section: Figure 2 | (A)mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Geologic map of study area showing previously reported sand blow sites (Cox et al, 2004(Cox et al, , 2007(Cox et al, , 2010 and the 25 labeled field sites in this study ( Table 1). A "Site O" designation was intentionally not used to avoid confusion with Holocene liquefaction sites.…”
Section: Figure 2 | (A)mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The mapped distribution of large-scale liquefaction features (sand blows) in southeast Arkansas is largely confined to Holocene alluvium of the former courses of the Arkansas River and tributaries where the blows are readily visible in agricultural fields (Figure 2A). Our previous trenching of these sand blows provide age constraints and show cross-cutting relationships that show a minimum of six earthquakes that triggered sand venting in the last 8000 years (Cox et al, 2004(Cox et al, , 2007(Cox et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Elsewhere in the CEUS, sparse seismicity suggests that large earthquakes may have recurrence intervals longer than the historical record, which is generally two to four centuries long. Wherever sufficient paleoseismic work has been done in the CEUS outside the New Madrid, Charleston, and Charlevoix zones, findings document occurrences of prehistoric earthquakes larger than any in the historical record that occurred at intervals longer than the historical record (Madole 1988;Crone and Luza 1990;Crone, Machette, and Bowman 1997;Crone, Machette, Bradley et al 1997;Obermeier 1998;McNulty and Obermeier 1999;Tuttle et al 2006;Cox et al 2010). If recurrence intervals are that long, then earthquakes larger than any observed historically are possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%