The Earth's topography results from the competition between internal processes driven essentially by tectonic fluxes and external forcing primarily affected by climate (Molnar & England, 1990). Acting as a bridge linking these two forcings, surface processes provide a source of multiple feedback mechanisms (Champagnac et al., 2012). Analyzing the amplitude and distribution of surface erosion can provide important insights to understand tectonic processes and/or climatic variation. Moreover, surface erosion might play a critical role in defining the stress distribution and regional deformation by controlling topographic variations (Avouac & Burov, 1996; Willett, 1999). Thus, in active mountain ranges, quantifying surface erosion is fundamental for understanding not only the uplift history and topographic evolution, but also geodynamic processes at depth. Over recent decades, isotopic techniques have provided new approaches for the quantification of surface erosion processes, especially the widespread use of low-temperature thermochronology (e.g., Reiners & Brandon, 2006; Willett & Brandon, 2013) and in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides (e.g., Lal, 1991; Stone, 2000). Low-temperature thermochronology allows us to quantify the exhumation rate of rocks averaged over 10 6year time scale, based on the temperature-dependent diffusion or annealing in minerals (Reiners & Brandon, 2006). Measurement of in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides in exposed rocks and fluvial sediment