The Pennsylvanian lowlands of western Pangea are best known for their diverse
wetland floras of arborescent and herbaceous ferns, and arborescent horsetails and
clubmosses. In apparent juxtaposition, a very different kind of flora, dominated by a
xerophilous assemblage of conifers, taeniopterids and peltasperms, is occasionally
glimpsed. Once believed to represent upland or extrabasinal floras from well-drained
portions of the landscape, these dryland floras more recently have been interpreted as
lowland assemblages growing during drier phases of glacial/interglacial cycles. Whether
Pennsylvanian dryland and wetland floras were separated spatially or temporally remains an
unsettled question, due in large part to taphonomic bias toward preservation of wetland
plants. Previous paleobotanical and sedimentological analysis of the Markley Formation of
latest Pennsylvanian (Gzhelian) age, from north central Texas, U.S.A, indicates close
correlation between lithofacies and distinct dryland and wetland megaflora assemblages.
Here we present a detailed analysis one of those localities, a section unusual in
containing abundant palynomorphs, from the lower Markley Formation. Paleobotanical,
palynological and lithological data from a section thought to represent a single
interglacial/glacial phase are integrated and analyzed to create a complex picture of an
evolving landscape. Megafloral data from throughout the Markley Formation show that
conifer-dominated dryland floras occur exclusively in highly leached kaolinite beds,
likely eroded from underlying soils, whereas a mosaic of wetland floras occupy histosols,
ultisols, and fluvial overbank deposits. Palynological data largely conform to this
pattern but reveal a more complex picture. An assemblage of mixed wetland and dryland
palynofloral taxa is interpolated between a dryland assemblage and an overlying histosol
containing wetland taxa. In this section, as well as elsewhere in the Markley Formation,
kaolinite and overlying organic beds appear to have formed as a single genetic unit, with
the kaolinite forming an impermeable aquiclude upon which a poorly drained wetland
subsequently formed. Within a single inferred glacial/interglacial cycle, lithological
data indicate significant fluctuations in water availability tracked by changes in
palynofloral and megafloral taxa. Palynology reveals that elements of the dryland floras
appear at low abundance even within wetland deposits. The combined data indicate a complex
pattern of succession and suggest a mosaic of dryland and wetland plant communities in the
Late Pennsylvanian. Our data alone cannot show whether dryland and wetland assemblages
succeed one another temporally, or coexisted on the landscape. However, the combined
evidence suggests relatively close spatial proximity within a fragmenting and increasingly
arid environment.