2010
DOI: 10.1586/erd.10.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palladium alloys for biomedical devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As Ni is a well‐known sensitizer, its use in biomedical devices is an issue of debate throughout many medical disciplines (18, 19). Lately, it has been suggested that Pd might be a safe alternative to Ni as an alloying metal in biomedical devices (20). However, the results of this study discourage this suggestion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As Ni is a well‐known sensitizer, its use in biomedical devices is an issue of debate throughout many medical disciplines (18, 19). Lately, it has been suggested that Pd might be a safe alternative to Ni as an alloying metal in biomedical devices (20). However, the results of this study discourage this suggestion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Wide use of metal in jewelry, coins, surgical instruments, and dental restorations may be responsible for recent increases in allergy incidence [3]. Furthermore, the occurence of allergic reactions to dental materials is poorly understood [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr), which often induce metal allergy, palladium (Pd) was also reported as a causal metal for allergic contact dermatitis. Dental materials containing Pd have increased because of its resistance to corrosion [2,3]. Therefore, metal allergy caused by Pd ions eluted from dental materials has become a serious problem [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%